+1 to what Brandon wrote.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:23 PM Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss <
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
> Isn't the override in the RowType? So you can just have multiple
> RecordTypes, each with different RowTypes?
>
> Ultimately, it seems like the report is a bunch of fields
Isn't the override in the RowType? So you can just have multiple
RecordTypes, each with different RowTypes?
Ultimately, it seems like the report is a bunch of fields with a count, and
so the composition is to make sure that the set of rows is a "unique" key.
Theoretically you should log even the
This is where RUF reports are useful. For AUF reports, you are making an
assumption of fact not in evidence. I think the more reasonable approach
would be o provide a line forlocal policy ovrride (applied) and a line for
no local policy override applied. If the reporting period is a day (date)
tha
What is to be done if only a portion of the messages from the reporting period
receive a policy override? Perhaps this is done based on IP, or only applied
part way through the day. It seems like in the specification, the reporting
definition assumes the entire set of reported messages has the