Hi All,
I support WG adoption for document [2]
draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01.
Best Regards,
ChengLi
dmm-boun...@ietf.org 写于 2013-01-09 07:32:06:
> Happy a new year to everyone !
>
> [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 seems to be more
> faithful to the origi
Dear Chairs,
I support this document [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01.
Carl
From:
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 10:38:36 +0800
To: Seok-Joo Koh
Cc: 'Julien Laganier' , ,
, 'Jouni Korhonen'
Subject: [DMM] 答复: Re: Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and
gap analy
Hi All,
I support document [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01.
BR
liujuan
dmm-boun...@ietf.org 写于 2013/01/09 07:32:06:
> Happy a new year to everyone !
>
> [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 seems to be more
> faithful to the original motivations to DMM.
>
> I
Hi All,
I support WG adoption for document [2]
draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01.
Best Regards,
ChengLi
dmm-boun...@ietf.org 写于 2013-01-09 07:32:06:
> Happy a new year to everyone !
>
> [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 seems to be more
> faithful to the origi
Hi All,
I share same view with Philippe, and I support document [2]
draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01.
BR
Luowen
发件人: dmm-boun...@ietf.org
2013/01/08 17:03
收件人
Jouni Korhonen , "dmm@ietf.org"
抄送
Julien Laganier
主题
Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and
Happy a new year to everyone !
[2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 seems to be more faithful to
the original motivations to DMM.
In addition, both of the two documents are worthwhile to consider in the future
works on DMM.
Accordingly, it is suggested to use [2]
draft-liu-d
Hi Jouni & Julien,
|[1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02
|[2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01
After going through the two drafts, I think that [2] is in much better shape as
it stands now to form the _basis_ for a WG document, as it includes a gap
analysis that is more sober, t
Dear all,
I support [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01, which provides
clear current practices of IP mobility protocols and gap analysis.
Cheers.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologie
Hi all,
As I already mentioned during the DMM WG meeting in Atlanta,
the DMM WG will benefit when having a framework draft, such the one described
in well draft-liebsch-dmm-framework-analysis, for mainly two reasons:
1) comparison of existing solutions can be done using common terminology and
g
Hi Jouni,
IMHO, it is worth to use generic mobility functions (e.g. ingress/egress
redirection, location update, and so on) to describe and compare mobility
solutions. Such a framework shall facilitate comparison of solutions and gap
analysis. Actually, I think it is the only fair approach. For
Hi all,
I support [1] (draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-03) as WG document adoption. It
has specified current practices well in details, analyzing gaps and
limitations. I hope we'll able to progress the rest of DMM items.
Regards,
Seil
-Original Message-
From: dmm-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:d
Dear all,
As I already mentioned during previous email discussions, I think that
draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 [1], describes well several
mobility protocols considered for gap analysis and it describes a clear
identification of their limitations!
Therefore I am in favour of adopting this d
Dear all,
After going through the 2 documents, my opinion is that [1] has an
improved technical completeness (e.g. number of mobility protocols
considered for best practices description, and clear identification of
respective limitations) against that of ]2}. It also seems to have a
more logi
Dear all,
I went through the documents and I found that [2] provides a very clear and
comprehensive description of current practices and gap analysis.
Hence, I Support WG adoption for document [2]
draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01.
Best wishes
Philippe
-Message d'origine-
D
14 matches
Mail list logo
