--
Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random
Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University
#email: jonghy...@gmail.com
#webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon
> On Oct 24, 2014, at 3:40 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>
> my apologies for forwarding this conversat
Hi, here is a final update of AERO before IETF91. Please take a look to see if
this
brings it sufficiently up to 21st century requirements.
Thanks - Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com
-Original Message-
From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
internet-dra...@i
Ok.. once more.
On Oct 24, 2014, at 7:46 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> Le 24/10/2014 18:17, Brian Haberman a écrit :
>> Alex (and others),
>>
>> On 10/24/14 11:00 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>>> But under no circumstances should they become unaccountable with
>>> respect to the WG at large
Hi Alex,
> -Original Message-
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 9:47 AM
> To: dmm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [DMM] offlisted mails - names of Work Teams
>
> Le 24/10/2014 18:17, Brian Haberman a écrit :
> > Alex (and ot
Le 24/10/2014 18:17, Brian Haberman a écrit :
Alex (and others),
On 10/24/14 11:00 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
But under no circumstances should they become unaccountable with
respect to the WG at large.
Please (re-)read what I posted about these teams a little while ago.
http://www.ietf.o
Please find below some notes from last telco about the DMM work item Forwarding
Path and Signaling Management.
Best regards,
marco
--- notes from telco 2014-10-19: ---
Check if everybody is on the same page w.r.t. objectives.
Associated charter item has been read and focus of work item (WI) h
Alex (and others),
On 10/24/14 11:00 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> But under no circumstances should they become unaccountable with
> respect to the WG at large.
Please (re-)read what I posted about these teams a little while ago.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/current/msg01627.html
Le 24/10/2014 15:50, Jouni a écrit :
On Oct 24, 2014, at 12:42 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
I agree with this request from Behcet because it may give greater
visibility.
I am interested about what is happening in each of the teams,
although I also think they need a level of separation from t
Folks,
the clear winner for our next telco on the work item about Forwarding Path and
Signaling Management
is Monday, 3rd November 2014, 16:00 CET.
Duration: 90min.
I will send an agenda around before the meeting.
If you would like to see a particular item on the agenda, please let me know.
B
On Oct 24, 2014, at 12:42 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> I agree with this request from Behcet because it may give greater visibility.
>
> I am interested about what is happening in each of the teams, although I also
> think they need a level of separation from the rest of the world.
Could yo
Hi Sri,
ok, thanks,
-Hui
2014-10-23 23:49 GMT+08:00 Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) :
> Probably not. Its not updating RFC4283. Its defining new type values and
> certainly it can be done in a separate document.
>
> May be Chairs have a better view.
>
>
> Sri
>
> From: Hui Deng
> Date: Wednesda
I agree with this request from Behcet because it may give greater
visibility.
I am interested about what is happening in each of the teams, although I
also think they need a level of separation from the rest of the world.
What are the names of the work teams?
1 - Mobility Exposure
2 - Forward
12 matches
Mail list logo
