Pierrick,
Thanks for reviewing the draft.
H. Anthony Chan
From: pierrick.se...@orange.com [mailto:pierrick.se...@orange.com]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 4:33 PM
To: h chan
Subject: RE: Distributed Mobility Anchoring - Draft Review Request
Hello Anthony,
I'm fine with corrections. Thank you.
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Distributed Mobility Management WG of the IETF.
Title : MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283 Mobile Node
Identifier Option
Authors : Charles E. Perkins
Oh I’ve just noticed that you are referring -02 version. But the latest version
is -03.
Please find it from following link:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03
You can find much more about how stateless interworking works and its benefits.
Control-plane
Hi,
I've reviewed -07 and I think all the comments I made to -05 have been
address to a level good enough to make the document progress. I haven't
been able to do a full review, but looking at the diff from -05 to -06
it seems OK to me.
Apologies for the belated reply.
Thanks,
Carlos
On Fri, 2
Thank you Sri, for your review.
> 1.) It will be useful to identify the key data plane features used today in
> conjunction with the tunnel based approach and how those features are
> impacted when using SRv6 user plane.
Sure. But I’d just cite existing document which well described current
a
Authors:
Good work! Some high level comments on the draft.
1.) It will be useful to identify the key data plane features used today in
conjunction with the tunnel based approach and how those features are impacted
when using SRv6 user plane.
2.) There are heartbeat protocols that is used for
