On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 7:55 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>
> We are going to take your mail as input from LISP side.
Please, feel free to do so Behcet. Just note that it's not a comprehensive list.
Looking forward to the meeting on Thursday.
Best,
Alberto
___
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Uma Chunduri wrote:
> Great work, Thank you Kalyani & Tom.
>
> 2 quick questions:
>
> 1. I presume SR inline is just SRH with 2 SIDs as mentioned - didn't see the
> topology used. Do intermediate nodes handle these SIDs, with pointer update
> in SRH?
Two hosts
Great work, Thank you Kalyani & Tom.
2 quick questions:
1. I presume SR inline is just SRH with 2 SIDs as mentioned - didn't see the
topology used. Do intermediate nodes handle these SIDs, with pointer update in
SRH?
2. Also for Geneve - it's IP4 encap and VNI no TLVs?
--
Uma C.
-Orig
Dear Daniel,
Thanks a lot for your review. Please see some comments inline below.
On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 21:37 +, Daniel Corujo wrote:
> Dear Carlos, all,
>
> Just wanted to point out, and congratulate all authors, on a document
> well done: the partial schemes provide a clear mechanism for
>
Hi Alberto,
It seems like you are not in 5G IP mailing list (cc'ed above 5gangip).
At 5gangip we decided to work on end to end privacy enabled mapping system
and the group has a side meeting as follows:
Thursday March 22nd, 10:00 - 11:30 Room: IETF Side Meetings room
We are going to take your ma
Am 16.03.2018 um 09:19 schrieb Alberto Rodriguez-Natal:
> Hi all,
>
> In the DMM call this week, some people asked about the scalability of
> the Mapping System. The LISP community has delivered different solutions
> to address that challenge over the years. Here are some pointers to
> different
Hi all,
In the DMM call this week, some people asked about the scalability of the
Mapping System. The LISP community has delivered different solutions to
address that challenge over the years. Here are some pointers to different
Mapping System implementations, I'm sure that the folks at the LISP W
