On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:24:03PM -0400, Apollia wrote:
>
> Regarding desktops - perhaps Puppy Linux might be a good place to look for
> some inspiration? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puppy_Linux
>
> So small, light, fast, and relatively easy to use, even for total Linux
> newbies.
Ah yes, Pup
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Didier Kryn wrote:
>
> Le 22/03/2015 16:59, Steve Litt a écrit :
>
>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:53:02 +
>> Nuno Magalhães wrote:
>>
>> >On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:24 AM, T.J. Duchene
>>> >wrote:
>>>
> >What I said was at some point Devuan will probably have
> On March 22, 2015 at 6:29 AM Jaromil wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2015, Peter Olson wrote:
>
> > RMS didn't call me a troll, he answered the question. Somebody else
> > took it upon himself to refer to the question as trolling. I haven't
> > decided yet whether to speak to that person tomorrow
Would it be possible to avoid offensive characterization of people who
do not think along the same lines?
Would it be possible to avoid gender-biased characterization of people
who are participating in this list?
Thank you
==
hk
___
Dng mailing list
Dn
> I think everyone is in agreement that they fulfill the letter of the
> license. The spirit may be lacking especially in regards to access.
> Being an enormous, interdependent hairball simply puts the code out of
> reach for all practical purposes as well as restricting use. Again,
> that's spir
On 22.03.2015 22:00, KatolaZ wrote:
> Well, we might all agree on despising the systemd-nonsense on a
> technical level, but nobody can say it's not free software without
> being considered a fool. The systemd-nonsense is distributed with a
> free software license, therefore it *is* free software..
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 20:00:24 +
KatolaZ wrote:
> What is strange in the report made by Jaromil is the fact that just
> asking a question about the systemd-nonsense classifies you as a
> troll, which is quite unusual in the free software community.
Characterizing the anti-systemd person as a
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:09:50PM +0200, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 21.03.2015 18:51, Linuxito wrote:
> > Great reading. I knew RMS would answer something like that to that
> > question, if it's licensed under GPL, it's free software, period.
>
> ( Actually it's LGPL [1] but ... )
>
> I expect that
Sorry about that bad Subject line, gentlemen. I used Gmail's web interface
last night and it totally screwed things up.
@Steve Litt, Numo, and Patrick:
Frankly everyone, without trying to be rude here - that is your prerogative
whether you like or hate Gnome, systemd or whatever. I support
From: T.J. Duchene [mailto:t.j.duch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 2:25 AM
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: Dng Digest, Vol 6, Issue 75
Hey Steve!
"Do you understand what mailing list this is?"
Yes. I do. I didn't start the discussion. I actually recommended tabling it
Le 22/03/2015 16:59, Steve Litt a écrit :
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:53:02 +
Nuno Magalhães wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:24 AM, T.J. Duchene
>wrote:
> >What I said was at some point Devuan will probably have to support
> >systemd's API, in order to support upstream projects that actuall
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:53:02 +
Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:24 AM, T.J. Duchene
> wrote:
> > What I said was at some point Devuan will probably have to support
> > systemd's API, in order to support upstream projects that actually
> > require systemd.
>
> Why?
>
> Bigg
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 11:29:58 +0100
Jaromil wrote:
> But at the very least the episode is that of public denigration for
> somoene asking a question, made worse by the fact it is operated by a
> renown public figure and leader. This just sets an example for all the
> other guys present, plus gives
I support Nuno.
+1
On 22.03.2015 13:53, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:24 AM, T.J. Duchene wrote:
>> What I said was at some point Devuan will probably have to support systemd's
>> API, in order to support upstream projects that actually require systemd.
>
> Why?
>
> Biggest
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:24 AM, T.J. Duchene wrote:
> What I said was at some point Devuan will probably have to support systemd's
> API, in order to support upstream projects that actually require systemd.
Why?
Biggest example: GNOME (now) requires systemd. I don't want systemd,
so, i won't us
On Sun 22 March 2015 11:29:54 devuan...@spamgourmet.net wrote:
> Considering that the blog post is all about putting an idea up for
> discussion I really do not see how that can be undiscussed and
> unsolicited. How should you get a discussion started on the internet?
Considering how I clearly sta
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Jude Nelson - jud...@gmail.com
wrote:
>> The only way not to be forcing anybody is to stick with the least
>> common denominator for everything. That flat out stops progress.
>
> This is simply not true. A key hallmark of good application design is to
> keep the b
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Joerg Reisenweber -
reisenwe...@web.de
wrote:
> From
> *"root fs: any you like, even MSDOS (with some limitations)" *
> to an undiscussed unsolicited
> *"root fs: btrfs mandatory"*
> is *not* the kind of "progress" I want to see happen, ever.
The interesting prope
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015, Peter Olson wrote:
> > On March 21, 2015 at 6:36 PM Robert Storey
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hopefully, it's just a rumor, though it sounds real.
> >
> > Indeed, I've been wondering why RMS hasn't commented on systemd long
> > ago when it became obvious that it would effectively du
Hey Steve!
"Do you understand what mailing list this is?"
Yes. I do. I didn't start the discussion. I actually recommended
tabling it until after Devuan is released.
"Why in the *world* would we go to the substantial trouble of
depoetterizing Debian if we wanted systemd to sneak back in via some
20 matches
Mail list logo
