I have always thought that Google DNS is an attack against the ISPs
that want to use their resolvers to act as gatekeepers, divert their
customers to a different site, inject ads etc. Google needs your
ability to access the real net for its profit.
Arnt
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:46:13 -0600
Gordon Haverland ghave...@materialisations.com wrote:
Originally, the reason people bought graphics cards (or better graphics
cards) was to improve graphics performance. Which to a dinosaur like
me means X11 and X servers.
With due respect, your Worship, the
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Franco Lanza next...@nexlab.it wrote:
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends 0;
APT:Install-Suggests 0;
+1
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
Le 03/04/2015 11:10, marc...@welz.org.za a écrit :
Could it be we have some sort of Stockholm Syndrome where people
whose data is captured at google start emphasising with the captor ?
Or maybe we dimly remember that somewhere they use Linux and claimed
that they weren't doing evil,
Am Freitag, 3. April 2015, 10:35:45 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
That said, the fallback DNS is only used if no other DNS is configured.
Which IMHO is quite unusually.
I think not even then, cause I think systemd-resolved is not used, unless
activated and configured to be used in nsswitch.conf
Where i come from ISP's dynamic IP lease times are *very* long, you
need to reboot the home router to get a new IP and even then you may
get the same IP. It's not that dynamic, at all. Add that with data
your browser provides, your *.google.com in|direct usage, etc... it's
easy to
On Fri, 4/3/15, Anto arya...@chello.at wrote:
Subject: Re: [Dng] What do you guys think about Suggest and Recommends
dependency?
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Friday, April 3, 2015, 11:28 AM
On 03/04/15 01:53, hellekin wrote:
Oh, did I just announce the Devuan forum?
You did! And I just
On 03/04/15 00:36, Franco Lanza wrote:
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends 0;
APT:Install-Suggests 0;
in all my install apt.conf.
I don't like apt downloading and installing things that are not required
but just recommended or suggested, expecially in server or
In my case I prefer OpenWRT which uses dnsmasq to handle the task of LAN
IP assignments and name resolution.
- Nate
--
The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true.
Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us
On Fri 03 April 2015 22:55:58 marc wrote:
I believe some distributions already use things like dnsmasq
to do simpler caching
Maemo (N900) using dnsmasq http://maemo.org/packages/view/dnsmasq/
and even my more ancient wrt54g 2nd level router with Firmware: DD-WRT v24-
sp2 (07/22/09) mini offers
If I recall correctly, so far *every* Linux I've used uses an external
DNS by default instead of installing its own recursor.
I figure there must be a reason, but I don't know what it is.
So a cache becomes more efficient if several machines use it -
especially given the
Hi Marc,
P2P dns springs to mind. But it seems to have no recent development...
https://github.com/Mononofu/P2P-DNS
http://sourceforge.net/projects/p2pdns/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/qtdnsp2p/
http://qtdnsp2p.sourceforge.net/
You could also have a look at MaidSafe, for P2P cloud storage
Hello dears,
one of the current tasks of the Devuan Editors is to gather facts about
the Debian fork in order to write a compelling story to be told on
debianfork.org.
This domain will hopefully be the place to deflect and defuse any troll
about the Debian fork and systemd, in order to focus
-Original Message-
From: Martin Steigerwald [mailto:mar...@lichtvoll.de]
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 3:36 AM
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Dng] Another reason of why I am considering Devuan
Please do not Cc me personally on your reply.
[T.J. ] Apologies. Reply to all
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:52:46PM -0500, T.J. Duchene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Borowski [mailto:kilob...@angband.pl]
Then why not set up a recursor by default? Benefits include:
* avoiding this privacy issue
* caching
* secure DNSSEC (no last mile issues)
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 09:40:09PM +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:52 PM, T.J. Duchene t.j.duch...@gmail.com wrote:
DNS calls are nonspecific
data, associated only with your carrier's dynamic IP address, not a specific
user.
Where i come from ISP's dynamic IP lease
16 matches
Mail list logo
