dear Jaret,
thanks for your information
On Tue, 05 May 2015, Jaret Cantu wrote:
eudev continues to pull in relevant udev changes from the systemd
tree (without the init-specific filth, obviously) and even provides
some fixes of its own. It is like a window into some magical world
where
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:12:46PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 05:34:19PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
[cut]
I meant we should live with the fact that systemd is not unpluggable
:)
Nicely put. But do you draw any implication from that vis-a-vis
supporting
I am using lsof together with objdump -T executable to determine what
systemd functions are imported by essential XFCE4 executables.
For instance, this is for /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfs-udisks2-volume-monitor:
DF *UND* LIBSYSTEMD_209
sd_session_get_seat
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 06:27:49AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
[cut]
So why should we waste man-power on allowing to use systemd in a
distribution whose first aim and motivation is to provide a
systemd-free GNU/Linux?!?!?
Nor should we waste manpower making it extra difficult for
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:00 AM, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org wrote:
Send Dng mailing list submissions to
dng@lists.dyne.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
or, via email, send a message with
Le 06/05/2015 19:49, Anto a écrit :
On 06/05/15 10:23, Didier Kryn wrote:
Dear devuaners,
Debatting wether Devuan should allow systemd usage or forbid it
completely, or wether it should eradicate systemd service files from
all packages is interesting, but for sure prematurate. Let's
On May 6, 2015 8:33:31 PM CEST, Laurent Bercot ska-de...@skarnet.org wrote:
On 06/05/2015 19:49, Anto wrote:
When I started this thread, I genuinely asked technical question
related to what I am doing in removing systemd's files from Debian
sources of some packages. I am quite sure that I
On 06/05/15 10:23, Didier Kryn wrote:
Dear devuaners,
Debatting wether Devuan should allow systemd usage or forbid it
completely, or wether it should eradicate systemd service files from
all packages is interesting, but for sure prematurate. Let's discuss
that when someone proposes to
When it comes to building packages, you can always run rm with an option
against the temporary directory where the packer is targeting to remove any
files related to systemd, use sed or patches against existing scripts or import
custom scripts and configurations, and then allow the packager to
Yes. Eudev should be the target goal for now until Jude can get vdev
stabilized. There's also the aspect of using Busybox-mdev (mdev-like-a-boss
project has a lot of insight on this for generalized usages) though this would
forgo any allowances of evdev drivers for input devices and require the
Apoligies for the finger trouble - I hit send instead of cancel.
On Wed, 6 May 2015, Jim Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2015, Anto wrote:
On 05/05/15 16:05, David Hare wrote:
The decision in Debian to default the init system to systemd
is the main reason to fork Debian in the
11 matches
Mail list logo
