Re: [Dng] The result of my learning in the last few days

On 25/05/15 04:28, Anto wrote: . . I have tried to respect the efforts of others by preserving their commits, but their last updates and commits on some files are not being shown on the "Files" tab. . . After a lot of readings and trying to figure out what I did wrong in executing gi

Re: [Dng] Everyone's favorite DE: GNOME3

On 05/25/2015 05:31 PM, Jaret Cantu wrote: > I am happy to report that (most of) the GNOME3 Desktop Environment has > been made to work systemd-free, in all its spiffy, OpenGL-y goodness! Thanks a lot for your work! I might be one of the few that appreciates this DE, especially because it's quite

Re: [Dng] The more things change, the more they remain the same

Le 27/05/2015 17:51, Irrwahn a écrit : No intention to lessen your main point, but that last observation does not come as a surprise. Development systems inherently have an installation overhead compared to simple runtime environments, it's always been that way. However, it amazes me what heaps

Re: [Dng] The more things change, the more they remain the same

On 28/05/2015 11:43, Didier Kryn wrote: porting to Musl was not finished yet - still problems with dynamic linking he says. I prefer Musl to uClibc for several reasons I'm using musl too. You can use the Aboriginal toolchains, even if they're uClibc-based, to compile musl, and then link stuff

Re: [Dng] Everyone's favorite DE: GNOME3

On 05/28/2015 04:01 AM, Corrado Primier wrote: I had a quick testing run and I couldn't make it work, not sure if I should report a bug or if there are simply some things that are not there yet and I'm doing it wrong. I couldn't 'apt-get install gnome' because, down in the dependency chain, gvfs

Re: [Dng] Everyone's favorite DE: GNOME3

On 05/28/2015 01:22 PM, Jaret Cantu wrote: > Okay, a quick look at packages.debian.org says you're stretch-ing: > > * jessie (stable) > (libs): gphoto2 > digital camera library > 2.5.4-1.1+b2: amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips mipsel p

Re: [Dng] Everyone's favorite DE: GNOME3

On 28/05/2015 12:32, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org wrote: On 05/25/2015 05:31 PM, Jaret Cantu wrote: >I am happy to report that (most of) the GNOME3 Desktop Environment has >been made to work systemd-free, in all its spiffy, OpenGL-y goodness! Thanks a lot for your work! I might be one of the few

Re: [Dng] Everyone's favorite DE: GNOME3

On 05/28/2015 08:09 AM, David Harrison wrote: The more the merrier, I guess! Does this also make Cinnamon a prospect further down the line? Or has Cinnamon diverged too much for Gnome to make a difference? Brilliant work all round, anyway... Dave H Haven't tried yet, but I can! I actually

Re: [Dng] Everyone's favorite DE: GNOME3

I dont really want to troll, but I have to say I m not included in this "everyone" and the trinity, the kde3 fork, is great at many levels, and systemd-free, and is my favorite DE http://www.trinitydesktop.org/ give it a try ! On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Jaret Cantu wrote: > On 05/28/2015

Re: [Dng] OT: separate GUI from commands

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 04:54:53PM +0200, Laurent Bercot wrote: > On 27/05/2015 12:12, Hendrik Boom wrote: > >I'm in the process of writing (yet) a(nother) editor and output formatter, > >and on reading this, I started to wonder -- just how could one separate > >a command-line version from the UI?

Re: [Dng] OT: separate GUI from commands

Hi Jonathan, Shell-based command access to software like Powerpoint would indeed be > great. But I wonder if we can raise the bar a bit > and consider an approach that could serve the largest audience. > Especially users who themselves aren't developers or > programmers. > > It seems to me such a