Recently i debianized the latest release of bulmages (acounting and
invoicing program) in Qt5:
http://gnuinos.org/release16/?dir=devuan/pool/main/b/bulmages
And i had the following issue: the resulting packages were all empty!
This was due to the fact that the latest release is located in
On 20/08/15 04:21, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:42:29AM +0200, Jaromil wrote:
dear Karl,
thanks for your analysis
we haven't yet worked on the mirroring mechanism, but we will
once done, there will be a script and it will be easy
I guess it will be a sort of amprolla
aitor_czr aitor_...@gnuinos.org writes:
Recently i debianized the latest release of bulmages (acounting and
invoicing program) in Qt5:
http://gnuinos.org/release16/?dir=devuan/pool/main/b/bulmages
And i had the following issue: the resulting packages were all empty!
This was due to the
Spam detection software, running on the system tupac2,
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content
Thaks, i will try it.
Aitor.
On 22/08/15 16:58, Rainer Weikusat rainerweiku...@virginmedia.com wrote:
Use it as intended? In case you want to create a package installing
something in /usr/local (eg, because it's a local package not intended
for standalone distribution), the dh_usrlocal step
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 23:57:54 +0200
tilt! t...@linuxfoo.de wrote:
Hello,
it has come to my attention that an SSID is defined by a
(closed) IEEE standard as (I quote inofficial source [1]):
[...] 0-32 octets with arbitrary contents. A 0-length
SSID indicates the wildcard SSID (in probe
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:46:05 +0200
tilt! t...@linuxfoo.de wrote:
I agree with Laurent, the RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK rule weight should
be lowered below treshhold, because
1. it's incorrect to mark a mail as spam solely based on this
criterion, because a significant portion of internet users
My address sometimes gets blocked as coming from a dynamically
assigned IP address, even though the IP address is a static address.
Okay, that's odd. But what could the ISP do about it?
list services that use PBL are not a good idea and serve the interests
that are exactly opposite to the
Gentlemen,
On 08/22/2015 04:40 PM, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On 20/08/2015 11:27, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On 19/08/2015 17:39, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
[...]
p_len = strlen(IFACES_PATH);
e_len =
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 05:20:15PM +0200, Timo Buhrmester wrote:
from my legitimate IP
0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
[82.216.6.62 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
Note the 'dynamic'.
I wouldn't quite take this
On 22/08/2015 16:58, Laurent Bercot wrote:
Spam detection software, running on the system tupac2,
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the
11 matches
Mail list logo
