On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:55:44AM +0900, Simon Walter wrote:
>
>
> On April 26, 2016 4:36:04 AM GMT+09:00, Mitt Green
> wrote:
> > aitor_czr wrote:
> >
> >> Seeing that the kde project switched to
> >> cmake i guess it might be not so ugly aswell.
> >
> >I suppose,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:01:46AM +0100, David Hare wrote:
> On 26 April 2016 at 02:00, David Hare wrote:
> > I recently did a devuan-based install on a quite new Dell laptop.
> > Many things did not work properly (sound, wlan, touchpad). A newer
> > "backport" kernel
On 26 April 2016 at 02:00, David Hare wrote:
> I recently did a devuan-based install on a quite new Dell laptop.
> Many things did not work properly (sound, wlan, touchpad). A newer
> "backport" kernel sorted it all.
>
> On 25 April 2016 at 20:19, fuumind
On April 26, 2016 2:37:42 AM GMT+09:00, KatolaZ wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:36:44PM +0100, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
>> kato...@freaknet.org writes:
>> >Seeing that 90% of free software uses autohell I guess it might be
>not
>> >so ugly :)
>>
>> That's the Microsoft
SpaceFM with udevil automounts external
devices. Removing gvfs also means no
automount in Thunar, apart from
losing wastebasket. udevil works
from console, too.
/ Mitt
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
gvfs* builds and works (at least for Jessie) without *systemd* deps, I
have done it. I now use Adam's version (posted at angband.pl) for
XFCE. My TDE systems don't need gvfs (nor anything else GTK) to handle
usb mounts and "trash".
My "debian purist" attitude against custom and 3rd-party builds,
Hi!
I am trying to get touchpad scrolling working on my new Devuan setup. So far
I've figured out that it is probably pmouse that is driving the hardware by
stealing the following from
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/131432/which-driver-is-handling-my-touchpad
:
lsmod|grep -iE
Having too little time to spend struggling with a debootstrap cross
install, I built a devuan installation USB key, first with unetbootin
and then with a dd copy. Results the same in either case, so I'll just
describe my experience with the second.
I did # dd
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:29:18 -0400
> Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:21:50AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
>> > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 04:01:33 +
>> > Stephanie Daugherty
On 04/25/2016 11:17 AM, aitor_czr wrote:
>
> On 04/25/2016 04:54 PM, fsmithred wrote:
>> You need to have gvfs installed if you want an icon to pop up on the
>> desktop when you plug in a usb drive. You can have xfce without gvfs. I'm
>> not sure about the other desktops.
>
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Haines Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:47:15PM +0200, parazyd wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Haines Brown wrote:
>
> > > Perhaps my problem was that I unpacked the devuan.debian.tar.gz archive
> > > on the target /mnt/debinist/usr/share. If instead I run
> > >
>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:47:15PM +0200, parazyd wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Haines Brown wrote:
> > Perhaps my problem was that I unpacked the devuan.debian.tar.gz archive
> > on the target /mnt/debinist/usr/share. If instead I run
> >
> > # dpkg -i debootstrap_1.0.75-1+devuan1_all.deb
> >
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:36:44PM +0100, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> kato...@freaknet.org writes:
> >Seeing that 90% of free software uses autohell I guess it might be not
> >so ugly :)
>
> That's the Microsoft Windows argument: "Seeing that 90% use windows
> it can't be so bad".
>
My comment
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:29:18 -0400
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:21:50AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 04:01:33 +
> > Stephanie Daugherty wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to see a long term focus on removing the
kato...@freaknet.org writes:
Seeing that 90% of free software uses autohell I guess it might be not
so ugly :)
That's the Microsoft Windows argument: "Seeing that 90% use windows it
can't be so bad".
Arnt
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Haines Brown wrote:
> I apologize for being so slow, but problems abound. I decided to try the
> devuan installation with the installer ISO on a key. I used the
> devuan-jessie-i386-alpha4-netboot.iso. However, when it came time to
> download installation components from the
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:17:23AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:59:54AM +0200, aitor_czr wrote:
> >
> > On 04/25/2016 06:44 AM, Mitt Green wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> > >CMake is written in C++, too, and is big and slow.
> > >It's even worse than Autohell.
On 04/25/2016 04:54 PM, fsmithred wrote:
You need to have gvfs installed if you want an icon to pop up on the
desktop when you plug in a usb drive. You can have xfce without gvfs. I'm
not sure about the other desktops.
As far as i know, if your uninstall gvfs, you will
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 15:54 +0100, David Hare wrote:
> I just installed qemu again and successfully booted both the latest
> unmodified Refracta and ExeGNU ISO's, through to the desktop, without
> noticing any significant errors
>
> qemu-system-x86_64 -m 384 -cdrom snapshot_current.iso
>
>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:55:45PM +0200, parazyd wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Haines Brown wrote:
>
> > It installed a base system on the target disk mounted on
> > /mnt/debinst. But that base system is apparently broken because of a
> > version inconsistency:
> >
> > W:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:21:50AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 04:01:33 +
> Stephanie Daugherty wrote:
>
> > I'd like to see a long term focus on removing the entanglement with
> > other invasive dependencies, particularly those which are likely to
>
On 04/24/2016 04:46 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> Aren't there two icewms, which differ in that they have different
> capital letter in their names? One of which has more stuff than the
> other? In the days when I used Debian, there was definitely more tham
> one icewm on the desktop/wm menu.
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Haines Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:37:24PM +0200, parazyd wrote:
>
> > Yes, debootstrap works on any system. Note that if you wish to bootstrap
> > devuan systems, use devuan's debootstrap (which was fixed):
> >
On 04/25/2016 12:17 PM, KatolaZ wrote:
>On 04/25/2016 06:44 AM, Mitt Green wrote:
[cut]
> >CMake is written in C++, too, and is big and slow.
> >It's even worse than Autohell.
> >
> >Sorry for my allergy to cee plus plus. It spreads
> >to HTML ‎emails, too.
>
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:37:24PM +0200, parazyd wrote:
> Yes, debootstrap works on any system. Note that if you wish to bootstrap
> devuan systems, use devuan's debootstrap (which was fixed):
> https://packages.devuan.org/devuan/pool/main/d/debootstrap/
Yes, I unarchived
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:59:54AM +0200, aitor_czr wrote:
>
> On 04/25/2016 06:44 AM, Mitt Green wrote:
[cut]
> >CMake is written in C++, too, and is big and slow.
> >It's even worse than Autohell.
> >
> >Sorry for my allergy to cee plus plus. It spreads
> >to HTML
On 04/25/2016 06:44 AM, Mitt Green wrote:
Here you are an example about how to build a
>gtkmm application using cmake:
[...]
Hey,
Let me put my two cents in. I wouldn't be using
both gtkmm and CMake. GTK+ by itself is not
very beautiful (glib), GTK+3 just sucks, but
Hi,
Since I have been away for the last few weeks I would like to ask
whether udev's replacement is ready for Devuan 64 bit. I tried:
apt-get -s remove udev
which resulted in the following text output. I am concluding this
means udev is still an essential dependency that cannot be removed
yet.
Steve Litt writes:
I'm not sure the preceding sentence yields a mutual exclusivity, but
yes, I really would like that history lesson, as this is something that
has bothered me for a long time.
The WM is regulated by the ICCCP, which basically talks about how windows
interact with each other
29 matches
Mail list logo