Quoting Simon Hobson (li...@thehobsons.co.uk):
> I'm suggesting that spending a lot of valuable dev time knocking a few
> seconds off* an install isn't the best use of that resource.
I wasn't suggesting a distro installer checkbox item offering local
recursive nameservice for use during installat
Rick Moen wrote:
> Why settle for bad when you can have excellent for free? But you don't
> see it, so we're wasting time talking.
Actually I do see exactly what you are saying - and I have come across
resolvers with poor performance. For **for the duration of an install**, just
how many DNS
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:44:34AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> Does it shiw correctly with "iw dev"? That's iw from
> http://www.linuxwireless.org/en/users/Documentation/iw/
I'm currently running the armhf image testing another issue I'm
preparing to report. If someone doesn't answer before I w
Quoting Simon Hobson (li...@thehobsons.co.uk):
> So, OK add it as an option in an advanced level install.
That would be pointless. I've already detailed why. This is just a
complicated way of saying 'We're not bothering'. If you-all don't want
to bother, fine. Do it the simple way, by doing n
On 06/01/2017 20:27, Dan Purgert wrote:
Maybe I missed something in the original mail - I read Fred's mail as a
"ha, lookie you RedHat, getting the same 'X is now considered legacy'
statements made about one of your things"...
Spot on, it was a spoof on RedHat. Don't they keep on telling us th
On 01/06/2017 12:26 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:05:34 +
> Simon Hobson wrote:
>
>> Fred DC wrote:
>>
>>> My apologies for not realizing that this is an *anti-systemd*
>>> mailinglist.
>>
>> Dunno if that was supposed to be sarcasm or not ...
>>
>> The list isn't "anti-s
On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:05:34 +
Simon Hobson wrote:
> Fred DC wrote:
>
> > My apologies for not realizing that this is an *anti-systemd*
> > mailinglist.
>
> Dunno if that was supposed to be sarcasm or not ...
>
> The list isn't "anti-systemd" - it's pro-freedom. It's just that
> systemd
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 11:57:28AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
[cut]
>
> Oh Oh,
>
> The new setnet.sh is more busted than the old. You fixed the part about
> enps0 not being configurable, thank you, but now when I say configure
> and it lists enps0 and I press Enter, instead of giving me a further
On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:23:59 +
KatolaZ wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:44:34AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 04:07:48PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:08:52PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
> > > > Steve, that's already been fixed. The dete
Well said.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Simon Hobson
wrote:
> Fred DC wrote:
>
> > My apologies for not realizing that this is an *anti-systemd*
> mailinglist.
>
> Dunno if that was supposed to be sarcasm or not ...
>
> The list isn't "anti-systemd" - it's pro-freedom. It's just that system
Fred DC wrote:
> My apologies for not realizing that this is an *anti-systemd* mailinglist.
Dunno if that was supposed to be sarcasm or not ...
The list isn't "anti-systemd" - it's pro-freedom. It's just that systemd is
anti-freedom, and so being pro-freedom can appear to be anti-systemd.
Or p
On 06/01/2017 14:59, Anto wrote:
I am not sure why BlankOn Linux is being bought up into this anti
systemd mailing list. They clearly endorse systemd and follow debian,
https://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=id&u=http://dev.blankonlinux.or.id/ticket/1415.
But hey, this is an open mail
Rick Moen wrote:
>> IFF we are going to put stuff in to work around problems for one set
>> of edge cases (and IMO it's debatable whether we should), then why not
>> also cater for what is possibly a larger group of edge cases ? Your
>> argument seems to be "this is the only set of edge cases I'm
On 06/01/17 11:03, Fred DC wrote:
Just for the fun.
Does Gnome3 (aka RH) know that they use a technology which is considered
by some a legacy technology?
Me thinks, that maybe by the time s*d is more than just useable it might
also be considered a legacy init-scheme.
Quoting from the Release
I just realised I probably need to correct an error:
> PowerDNS Recursor is the recursive-server matching element to PowerDNS
> Authoritative Server from the same folks. Both are back-ended into SQL
> databases (default MyS
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:44:34AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 04:07:48PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:08:52PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
> > > Steve, that's already been fixed. The detection of interface type is
> > > implemented using iwconfig now
Quoting Simon Hobson (li...@thehobsons.co.uk):
> IFF we are going to put stuff in to work around problems for one set
> of edge cases (and IMO it's debatable whether we should), then why not
> also cater for what is possibly a larger group of edge cases ? Your
> argument seems to be "this is the o
On 5 Jan 2017, at 23:33, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Simon Hobson (li...@thehobsons.co.uk):
>> Rick Moen wrote:
>>
>>> Without objection, I'll point out that one leading advantage of a local
>>> recursive server (what you probably mean when you say 'caching DNS
>>> server'[1]) is that it Just W
Just for the fun.
Does Gnome3 (aka RH) know that they use a technology which is considered
by some a legacy technology?
Me thinks, that maybe by the time s*d is more than just useable it might
also be considered a legacy init-scheme.
Quoting from the Release Notes of the BlankOn Distro:
BlankO
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 04:07:48PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:08:52PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
> > Steve, that's already been fixed. The detection of interface type is
> > implemented using iwconfig now, and is not based on interface names
> > any more.
>
> That isn't go
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 04:07:48PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:08:52PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
> > Steve, that's already been fixed. The detection of interface type is
> > implemented using iwconfig now, and is not based on interface names
> > any more.
>
> That isn't go
21 matches
Mail list logo
