[DNG] [kato...@freaknet.org: Re: FF pulseaudio hard dependency is here]

2017-03-08 Thread KatolaZ
Sorry, this was intended to be a reply to the list :) - Forwarded message from KatolaZ - Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 06:32:49 + From: KatolaZ To: Arnt Karlsen Subject: Re: [DNG] FF pulseaudio hard dependency is here

Re: [DNG] FF pulseaudio hard dependency is here

2017-03-08 Thread KatolaZ
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:14:56PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote: [cut] > > > > I was about to write a similar message, as I just found out about the > > new "feature" the hard way. > > In the short term I think I'm going to switch to midori. > > I haven't gotten midori to work in a satisfying

Re: [DNG] FF pulseaudio hard dependency is here

2017-03-08 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:47:00PM +0100, Alessandro Selli wrote: > Il 08/03/2017 18:33, goli...@dyne.org ha scritto: > > This is a follow up to this old thread: > > https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20161002.124357.7c39d049.en.html > > > > According to this post on FDN - > >

Re: [DNG] FF pulseaudio hard dependency is here

2017-03-08 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:56:22 +, KatolaZ wrote in message <20170308175622.gv1...@katolaz.homeunix.net>: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 11:33:30AM -0600, goli...@dyne.org wrote: > > This is a follow up to this old thread: > > https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20161002.124357.7c39d049.en.html > >

Re: [DNG] FF pulseaudio hard dependency is here

2017-03-08 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:47:00PM +0100, Alessandro Selli wrote: > I'm going to look for technical reasons because PA should not be made > the only sound backend in Linux. I remember when PA was new my reaction > was negative because it was behaving badly (made sound worse), it kept > spawning

Re: [DNG] FF pulseaudio hard dependency is here

2017-03-08 Thread Vince Mulhollon
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:59 AM, wrote: > Unless FF 52 onward is recompiled with the alsa switch enabled, it will > be unusable for most of us. Now wait a minute, this is just sound, right, I haven't used sound on a desktop in years, that seems to be a "podcast on my phone"

Re: [DNG] FF pulseaudio hard dependency is here

2017-03-08 Thread Alessandro Selli
Il 08/03/2017 18:33, goli...@dyne.org ha scritto: > This is a follow up to this old thread: > https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20161002.124357.7c39d049.en.html > > According to this post on FDN - > http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?p=638632#p638632 - the hard > pulseaudio requirement has

Re: [DNG] FF pulseaudio hard dependency is here

2017-03-08 Thread KatolaZ
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 11:59:17AM -0600, goli...@dyne.org wrote: > On 2017-03-08 11:48, J. Fahrner wrote: > >Am 08.03.2017 um 18:33 schrieb goli...@dyne.org: > > > >> > >>"From Firefox 52 onwards, pulseaudio is a hard requirement for sound > >>on linux. Alsa is unsupported and alsa code will be

Re: [DNG] FF pulseaudio hard dependency is here

2017-03-08 Thread golinux
On 2017-03-08 11:48, J. Fahrner wrote: Am 08.03.2017 um 18:33 schrieb goli...@dyne.org: "From Firefox 52 onwards, pulseaudio is a hard requirement for sound on linux. Alsa is unsupported and alsa code will be removed in Firefox 54." (from - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.c ...

Re: [DNG] FF pulseaudio hard dependency is here

2017-03-08 Thread KatolaZ
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 11:33:30AM -0600, goli...@dyne.org wrote: > This is a follow up to this old thread: > https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20161002.124357.7c39d049.en.html > > According to this post on FDN - > http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?p=638632#p638632 - the hard >

Re: [DNG] FF pulseaudio hard dependency is here

2017-03-08 Thread J. Fahrner
Am 08.03.2017 um 18:33 schrieb goli...@dyne.org: > > "From Firefox 52 onwards, pulseaudio is a hard requirement for sound > on linux. Alsa is unsupported and alsa code will be removed in Firefox > 54." (from - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.c ... 47056#c178 ) Pulseaudio? Not with me. :-(

[DNG] FF pulseaudio hard dependency is here

2017-03-08 Thread golinux
This is a follow up to this old thread: https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20161002.124357.7c39d049.en.html According to this post on FDN - http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?p=638632#p638632 - the hard pulseaudio requirement has now been implemented: "From Firefox 52 onwards,

Re: [DNG] overriding install paths in debian/rules

2017-03-08 Thread aitor_czr
Hi again, El 08/03/17 a las 14:53, aitor_czr escribió: Hi Dan, El 08/03/17 a las 13:00, Daniel Reurich escribió: On 08/03/17 21:16, Daniel Reurich wrote: On 08/03/17 20:51, Svante Signell wrote: On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 17:38 +1300, Daniel Reurich wrote: Hi, I

Re: [DNG] overriding install paths in debian/rules

2017-03-08 Thread aitor_czr
Hi Dan, El 08/03/17 a las 13:00, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org escribió: On 08/03/17 21:16, Daniel Reurich wrote: On 08/03/17 20:51, Svante Signell wrote: On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 17:38 +1300, Daniel Reurich wrote: Hi, I need a bit of advice with regards to the specific usage of overrides in

Re: [DNG] overriding install paths in debian/rules

2017-03-08 Thread Daniel Reurich
On 08/03/17 21:16, Daniel Reurich wrote: > On 08/03/17 20:51, Svante Signell wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 17:38 +1300, Daniel Reurich wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I need a bit of advice with regards to the specific usage of overrides >>> in debian/rules. >>> >>> The situation I have is I want to

Re: [DNG] overriding install paths in debian/rules

2017-03-08 Thread Daniel Reurich
On 08/03/17 20:51, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 17:38 +1300, Daniel Reurich wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I need a bit of advice with regards to the specific usage of overrides >> in debian/rules. >> >> The situation I have is I want to rename an installed in the debian >> package so I can