On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:26:47 +0200
Jaromil wrote:
> let me just add that - as we will be out with the release candidate
> and the stable release very soon now - we count on all of you here to
> show maturity and not feed the trolls who will be coming attracted by
> Devuan's
Hi folks,
(xposting to cairo, debian maintainers and devuan list)
I'm currently packaging recent cairo (w/ drm patches) for several deb
Distros, and ran into trouble w/ missing Makefile.am.features files.
Debian just adds these files directly (along w/ other stuff, eg. some
prebuit docs -
Il 13/04/2017 16:55, Rick Moen ha scritto:
> Quoting Alessandro Selli (alessandrose...@linux.com):
>
>> This is what can be logically inferred from what you wrote.
> No.
Yep.
> I'm sorry this conversation was not fruitful, which as mentioned is why I have
> disengaged. Have a great day.
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:49:53 -0400, Renaud wrote in message
<20170413094953.0b06f...@ron.cerrocora.org>:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:04:57 +0200
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> > > > Well, the official policy, insofar as there is one, appears to
> > > > be that Devuan is about choice.
On 2017-04-13 11:44, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:57:09AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
...
...
Systemd is not an init system; it is an operating system. Devuan
runs a
Gnu/Linux OS which is not Systemd. Even if the two are using almost
the same
kernel, they aren't the same
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:57:09AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
...
...
>
> Systemd is not an init system; it is an operating system. Devuan runs a
> Gnu/Linux OS which is not Systemd. Even if the two are using almost the same
> kernel, they aren't the same OS. The most typical effect of this is
Quoting Alessandro Selli (alessandrose...@linux.com):
> This is what can be logically inferred from what you wrote.
No.
I'm sorry this conversation was not fruitful, which as mentioned is why I have
disengaged. Have a great day.
___
Dng mailing
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 05:32:05 -0400, Renaud wrote in message
<20170413053205.3a7e6...@ron.cerrocora.org>:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:32:32 -0400
> Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> > Well, the official policy, insofar as there is one, appears to be
> > that Devuan is about choice.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 at 14:18:34 -0700 Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Alessandro Selli (alessandrose...@linux.com):
>
>> As sudo can be made to operate either requiring the user to type his
>> own password or no password, stating (now) that just "a particular usage
>> model" of
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:32:32 -0400
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Well, the official policy, insofar as there is one, appears to be that
> Devuan is about choice. Therefore, it should make available (1) the
> choice to do without systemd and (2) the choice to use systemd.
The
Hi KatolaZ,
... and sorry for my delay...
On 04/11/2017 02:00 PM, KatolaZ wrote:
Thanks aitor. It would be great to have vdev in ascii, innit?
Yes, it should be added in asci/ceres, not in jessie.
Do you think it might be possible to try building the vdev package
Le 13/04/2017 07:03, Steve Litt a écrit :
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:32:32 -0400
Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 08:13:46PM -0400, Dan Purgert wrote:
On 04/12/2017 11:58 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
[...]
Systemd actively sabotages the ability to replace it,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Mi den 12. Apr 2017 um 16:58 schrieb Steve Litt:
> I have no knowledge of the origin of this thread, probably having to do
> with my .procmailrc /dev/nulling certain people. But I have a very
> clear message about this thread's subject: There's
Am 2017-04-13 04:32, schrieb Hendrik Boom:
Devuan is about choice. Therefore, it should make available (1) the
choice to do without systemd and (2) the choice to use systemd.
This is impossible with a binary distribution. systemd is not only an
init system, it pervades the whole system. You
14 matches
Mail list logo