Anno domini 2020 Thu, 21 May 05:00:03 +0100
tux...@sapo.pt scripsit:
> Citando Dr. Nikolaus Klepp :
>
> > Anno domini 2020 Tue, 19 May 21:56:16 +0100
> > ael scripsit:
> >> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:35:22PM +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 19 May 2020 at 22:30:50, ael wrote:
> >>
> >>>
Citando Steve Litt :
This whole discussion balances on the definition of "shell aware". What
is "shell aware?"
SteveT
Have you tried to write shell script code into the execution command
of a systemd unit file?
it doesn't work right?!
Why do you think it doesn't work?
For it to work yo
Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
> > Steve's is a classic non-testable paranoid
>
> It would be testable if we could put on the witness stand under oath
> somebody who attended the meetings that decided to push systemd.
I mean, of course, testable in the real world.
Meanwhile, a
I forgot..
The bootloader needs support for f2fs, but since you are able to
launch the kernel, it should be supported by definition( it loads the
kernel into memory...so it access the block device.. )..
Citando tux...@sapo.pt:
Citando Dr. Nikolaus Klepp :
Anno domini 2020 Tue, 19 May 2
Citando Dr. Nikolaus Klepp :
Anno domini 2020 Tue, 19 May 21:56:16 +0100
ael scripsit:
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:35:22PM +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
On Tuesday 19 May 2020 at 22:30:50, ael wrote:
I am hoping to install beowulf onto a new laptop in a week or two.
I use f2fs on several drives w
On Tue, 19 May 2020 12:03:20 -0700
Rick Moen via Dng wrote:
> > Presumably Steve Litt's point is that Red Hat has to make the
> > internals complex so that there's complexity to shield the costomer
> > from.
>
> Steve's is a classic non-testable paranoid
It would be testable if we could put
On Tue, 19 May 2020 07:32:24 -0400
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Presumably Steve Litt's point is that Red Hat has to make the
> internals complex so that there's complexity to shield the costomer
> from.
That's one of my two points. The other point is a complexified Linux
makes their education and cer
On Tue, 19 May 2020 10:29:02 +0100
Peter Duffy wrote:
> Apologies for following up on my own post - just an afterthought.
>
> When I originally encountered systemd, the word was that it was so
> pervasive that it couldn't be removed (obviously, now we know
> different ;) )
>
> Given the allege
On Tue, 19 May 2020 00:01:35 -0700
Rick Moen via Dng wrote:
> Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
>
> > Substitute the word "needlessly complex" for "overengineered" and I
> > don't like it either. But 1), I don't think you'd get anywhere near
> > universal agreement that by_path, by
On Tue, 19 May 2020 04:14:05 +0100
tux...@sapo.pt wrote:
> The problem is that this init systems are not shell aware.
I don't know what "shell aware" means. The minute a file begins with:
#!/bin/sh
the rest of the text executes according to the
grammar/syntax/capabilities of /bin/sh.
> yes th
Anno domini 2020 Tue, 19 May 21:56:16 +0100
ael scripsit:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:35:22PM +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 May 2020 at 22:30:50, ael wrote:
> >
> > > I am hoping to install beowulf onto a new laptop in a week or two.
> > > I use f2fs on several drives with good re
[gets reply recipient right this time, sorry for the personal email last
time Rick]
On Tue, 19 May 2020, Rick Moen via Dng wrote:
> You did, of course, say _unique_ partition labels, which avoids that
> gentleman's quite perplexing problem.
The uniqueness problem is easier to manage when it's
On Mon, 18 May 2020 21:39:11 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
> I eschew Occam's Razor in favor of Litt's Razor, which can be
> paraphrased "Follow the money."
See also the maxim of Cassius:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cui_bono
"to whom is it a benefit?"
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
