Quoting Mark Rousell (mark.rous...@signal100.com):
> Option 1 is a bit embarrassing if anyone notices (e.g.
> "host-46462.static.bugtown.myisp.net" isn't too cool as the name of your
> mail server) but I don't see any technical downside, although DMARC
> might perhaps be an issue nowadays.
DMARC
On Thu, 2020-09-24 at 17:32 +0100, Mark Rousell wrote:
> On 24/09/2020 13:43, Jim Jackson wrote:
>
>
>
> > Mostly. Somemail servers do a reverse IP lookup and see if it
> > matches your envelope From domain.
> >
>
> Yes, this is an annoyance. There are two ways
On 24/09/2020 16:40, Simon Hobson wrote:
>
> But if you do "accept then bin", you can scale your resources for more
> average rates and just let messages sit in a queue for a few minutes when
> things are really busy. Given the resources available to MS and Google (to
> name just two), that's
On 24/09/2020 13:43, Jim Jackson wrote:
> Mostly. Somemail servers do a reverse IP lookup and see if it matches your
> envelope From domain.
Yes, this is an annoyance. There are two ways round this: (1) Change
your server's SMTP From domain to be the same as your static IP's PTR
hostname, and
Mark Rousell wrote:
>> But once you accept a
>> message with a success status after the DATA stage, you are obliged to
>> either really deliver it or else bounce it back. It is not acceptable to
>> send messages down a "black hole".
> This *should* not be acceptable (and it's very annoying if
On 24-09-2020 14:43, Jim Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2020, Mark Rousell wrote:
>
>> On 24/09/2020 07:30, Dimitris via Dng wrote:
>>> in my opinion a home connection server smtp+imap/pop will not be very
>>> usable. most rbl's block dynamic addresses so you won't be able to
>>> deliver much...
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020, Mark Rousell wrote:
> On 24/09/2020 07:30, Dimitris via Dng wrote:
> >
> > in my opinion a home connection server smtp+imap/pop will not be very
> > usable. most rbl's block dynamic addresses so you won't be able to
> > deliver much...
>
> In some areas (e.g. the UK), the
On 24/09/2020 11:14, Mark Rousell wrote:
On 24/09/2020 07:30, Dimitris via Dng wrote:
in my opinion a home connection server smtp+imap/pop will not be very
usable. most rbl's block dynamic addresses so you won't be able to
deliver much...
In some areas (e.g. the UK), the better ISPs
On 24/09/2020 07:30, Dimitris via Dng wrote:
>
> in my opinion a home connection server smtp+imap/pop will not be very
> usable. most rbl's block dynamic addresses so you won't be able to
> deliver much...
In some areas (e.g. the UK), the better ISPs provide static IPs so this
issue is bypassed.
On 23/09/2020 20:13, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> But once you accept a
> message with a success status after the DATA stage, you are obliged to
> either really deliver it or else bounce it back. It is not acceptable to
> send messages down a "black hole".
This *should* not be acceptable (and it's
On 23/09/2020 02:32, DECbot wrote:
> Since my ISP is the devil and blocks port 25, I'm using autossh to
> forward port 25 traffic to a $5/month vps.
Do you have difficulty with your outgoing SMTP being blocked (often
silently swallowed, from what I've seen) to certain large mail services
using
On 9/23/20 11:05 PM, Marjorie Roome via Dng wrote:
> 1) a more restrictive postfix main.cf than in the guide, so less spam
> gets through to rspamd: postfix rejected about 37% of emails last
> month, rspamd about 7% with another 5% going to to users spam folders
> and is thus reviewable by them.
On 9/20/20 12:55 AM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> Easiest possible newbie email server setup, use and support, ideas?
in my opinion a home connection server smtp+imap/pop will not be very
usable. most rbl's block dynamic addresses so you won't be able to
deliver much...
i'd suggest a host/vps online
13 matches
Mail list logo
