Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Steve Litt
On Sat, 2022-07-30 at 17:10 +0200, Antony Stone wrote: > On Saturday 30 July 2022 at 16:47:59, Steve Litt wrote: > > > Inconvenient to newbies? LOL, compare it to *too or Slackware :-) > > Have I missed something - are there spinoffs from Gentoo which also end in > too? > > Just intrigued at

Re: [DNG] About the majoritys choise (Re: article about devuan)

2022-07-30 Thread Syeed Ali
On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 20:36:27 +0200 (CEST) k...@aspodata.se wrote: > If you place a million monkeys in front of typewriters, > Shakespears complete works will eventually emerge; > well, Internet has proved that to be wrong. There might have actually been grand creations within the internet, but

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Syeed Ali
On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 08:20:51 -0400 Steve Litt wrote: > > "To use and understand Devuan, you must change your mindset and > > perception of the distribution’s > >  core beliefs. Because, in my perspective, Devuan is first > > philosophy and secondarily a Linux distribution." > > > > T H A T '

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Syeed Ali
On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 13:14:10 +0200 tito via Dng wrote: > Of the listed distributions only MX and Slackware rank betteer on > distrowatch.com, the other rank at about the same positions as Devuan. I never did understand distrowatch. Plenty of people just go to their distro directly, so

[DNG] *too (Re: article about devuan)

2022-07-30 Thread karl
Antony: > On Saturday 30 July 2022 at 16:47:59, Steve Litt wrote: > > Inconvenient to newbies? LOL, compare it to *too or Slackware :-) > Have I missed something - are there spinoffs from Gentoo which also end in > too? ... http://www.funtoo.org/

[DNG] About the majoritys choise (Re: article about devuan)

2022-07-30 Thread karl
olbigtenor: ... > Dunno as to the real reason but I've given up on trying to get others to > switch from M$ Win - - - - the argument always gets to 'the majority > of users just can't be wrong' to which there is no real effective counter. A million flies can't be wrong, shit is good. If you

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Curtis Maurand
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 30, 2022, at 11:10 AM, Antony Stone > wrote: > > On Saturday 30 July 2022 at 16:47:59, Steve Litt wrote: > >> Inconvenient to newbies? LOL, compare it to *too or Slackware :-) > > Have I missed something - are there spinoffs from Gentoo which also end in >

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Antony Stone
On Saturday 30 July 2022 at 16:47:59, Steve Litt wrote: > Inconvenient to newbies? LOL, compare it to *too or Slackware :-) Have I missed something - are there spinoffs from Gentoo which also end in too? Just intrigued at your (twice, now) use of the wildcard. Antony. -- You can spend the

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Steve Litt
On Sat, 2022-07-30 at 16:42 +0200, Didier Kryn wrote: > Le 30/07/2022 à 12:07, Steve Litt a écrit : > > I thought most of the Devuan review was accurate and complimentary. However, > > I've > > never thought of Devuan as "retro" or particularly inconvenient for newbies. > > It's Debian

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Steve Litt
On Sat, 2022-07-30 at 09:26 -0300, Fernando M. Maresca via Dng wrote: > I, however, really don't know if the author is malicious or simply ignorant; > these days there's a hord of people that think Debian's difficult. I > don't know why. I can think of only one reason: Debian's idealogical

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Didier Kryn
Le 30/07/2022 à 12:07, Steve Litt a écrit : I thought most of the Devuan review was accurate and complimentary. However, I've never thought of Devuan as "retro" or particularly inconvenient for newbies.     It's Debian itself which is known as inconvenient to newbies, hence Devuan, of course

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread o1bigtenor via Dng
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 7:26 AM Fernando M. Maresca via Dng wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 01:14:10PM +0200, tito via Dng wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 06:07:53 -0400 > > Steve Litt wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 14:27 +0200, tito via Dng wrote: > > > >

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Fernando M. Maresca via Dng
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 01:14:10PM +0200, tito via Dng wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 06:07:53 -0400 > Steve Litt wrote: > > > On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 14:27 +0200, tito via Dng wrote: > > > https://linuxiac.com/best-systemd-free-linux-distributions/ > > > > > > I think the author knows nothing

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Steve Litt
On Sat, 2022-07-30 at 13:14 +0200, tito via Dng wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 06:07:53 -0400 > Steve Litt wrote: > > > On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 14:27 +0200, tito via Dng wrote: > > > https://linuxiac.com/best-systemd-free-linux-distributions/ > > > > > > I think the author knows nothing about

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Steve Litt
On Sat, 2022-07-30 at 12:55 +0200, Antony Stone wrote: > > I'm rather more amazed that he labels Devuan (and therefore by extension > Debian too) as "retro" and yet gives a pretty complimentary review, in > comparison, of Slackware! ROFLMAO you're right. SteveT

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Curtis Maurand
I agree with Anthony’s assessment. I’ve been ising the mate desktop on devuan since ascii. my only complaint is lack of user management tools in the control panel. It’s a pretty minor beef since I’m ver comfortable on the command line. —Curtis Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 30, 2022, at 7:14

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread tito via Dng
On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 06:07:53 -0400 Steve Litt wrote: > On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 14:27 +0200, tito via Dng wrote: > > https://linuxiac.com/best-systemd-free-linux-distributions/ > > > > I think the author knows nothing about devuan and spreads FUD > > > > I thought most of the Devuan review was

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Antony Stone
On Saturday 30 July 2022 at 12:07:53, Steve Litt wrote: > On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 14:27 +0200, tito via Dng wrote: > > https://linuxiac.com/best-systemd-free-linux-distributions/ > > > > I think the author knows nothing about devuan and spreads FUD > > I thought most of the Devuan review was

Re: [DNG] article about devuan

2022-07-30 Thread Steve Litt
On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 14:27 +0200, tito via Dng wrote: > https://linuxiac.com/best-systemd-free-linux-distributions/ > > I think the author knows nothing about devuan and spreads FUD > I thought most of the Devuan review was accurate and complimentary. However, I've never thought of Devuan as