Hi,
I found on a couple of systems that an upgrade of bind9 caused it to fail to
start.
The fix [for me] was to do a second update/upgrade as well as making sure that
/etc/resolv.conf had a nameserver it could
find and use. I must have just been caught after doing the update to the
faulty ver
On 20/1/22 5:07 pm, goli...@devuan.org wrote:
> On 2022-01-19 23:08, Andrew McGlashan via Dng wrote:
>>
>> About the logo, /if/
Okay, then about the IMAGE ... /if/
...
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.d
On 20/1/22 7:56 am, Steve Litt wrote:
> Syeed Ali said on Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:56:59 -0800
>
>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 22:59:35 -0600
>> goli...@devuan.org wrote:
>>
>>> Or this might be even better https://transfer.sh/CeUT0r/if-rev3.png
>>
>> I submit:
>>
>> "Freedom includes init choice."
>
> V
On 17/1/22 1:54 pm, Ken Dibble wrote:
> Or just install tsp and submit the download commands to the queue.
What is "tsp" ?
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
On 20/1/22 1:03 am, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 January 2022 at 15:02:00, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:59:35PM -0600, goli...@devuan.org wrote:
Like this? https://transfer.sh/cTgmNi/if-rev2.png
>>>
>>> Or this might be even better https://transfer.sh/CeUT0r/
Hi,
Not fixed?
Did anybody look at this.
There are a bunch of new messages now coming from one or more other IP
addresses for the list.
A.
On 6/1/22 11:15 pm, Andrew McGlashan via Dng wrote:
> This report/notice is generated from the mail server which handles
> incoming and outgoing
Hi,
This report/notice is generated from the mail server which handles
incoming and outgoing emails for: the mailing list
NB: Incoming email has been flagged with a permanent error due to the
currently defined SPF ruleset as setup by those responsible for the
SENDING domain name.
Sending IP
Hi,
On 26/3/21 12:25 am, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Thursday 25 March 2021 at 14:16:52, Andrew McGlashan via Dng wrote:
>
>> "virsh shutdown vmname"
>>
>> The immediate response was that it would shutdown the vm
>>
>> However, d
Hi,
I set up a new kvm machine with beowulf 3.1 and created a simple vm that I plan
to use for Wireguard.
The problem I had was with doing:
"virsh shutdown vmname"
The immediate response was that it would shutdown the vm
However, doing "virsh list --all" still showed the vm
On 8/7/20 10:07 pm, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:14:51PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan via Dng wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/7/20 7:31 am, Alexander Bochmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> ...on Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 02:00:38AM +1000, Andrew McGlashan
On 8/7/20 7:31 am, Alexander Bochmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ...on Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 02:00:38AM +1000, Andrew McGlashan via Dng wrote:
>
> > After the dist-upgrade, it failed to boot and remained at the ministrants
> shell environment after having complained about not b
On 7/7/20 8:58 am, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Doesn't systemd require a merged /usr partition? It sounds as if a
> systemd-ism has crept into our boot process.
>
> Fortunately I haven't upgraded my server to beowulf yet.
Probably I know that Debian wants merged /usr, wasn't sure it was
specif
Hi,
I had another "simple" server upgrade from Devuan Ascii to Devuan Beowulf,
these are the details and my work around for the problem.
There was nothing particularly special about this server, it doesn't use
encrypted file systems; it started out life as a Debian Wheezy installation,
migrat
start properly, immediately and again after another reboot.
Should it be all good now?
Thanks
A.
On 6/7/20 12:04 am, Andrew McGlashan via Dng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded fron Devuan ascii to beowulf with the server running bind9 in
> a chroot environment and bind wou
Hi,
I just upgraded fron Devuan ascii to beowulf with the server running bind9 in a
chroot environment and bind would not start.
_This was the relevant error in /var/log/daemon.log_
Jul 5 23:36:43 bind9-server-name named[6476]: *could not configure root
hints from '/usr/share/dns/root.hi
Hi,
On 12/6/20 8:49 pm, Riccardo Mottola via Dng wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I just upgraded from ascii to beowulf a pretty decent laptop, equipped
> with a core i7 and 8GB of RAM.
>
> I upgraded everything in place: so same desktop environment, same
> applications, same hard disk... just "apt-get dist
Hi,
On 2/6/20 1:32 am, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>> $ wget -v4U "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
>> Firefox/60.0" https://www.idrix.fr/VeraCrypt/canary.txt--2020-06-01
>> 09:15:48--
>> https://www.idrix.fr/VeraCrypt/canary.txt
>> Connecting to 127.0.0.1:8118... connected.
>> ERRO
Hi,
On 1/6/20 6:37 pm, d...@d404.nl wrote:
> On 01-06-2020 01:31, Andrew McGlashan via Dng wrote:
>> ca-certificates
>>
>> /usr/bin/aptitude show -t stretch-backports ca-certificates:
>> E: Unable to locate package ca-certificates:
>>
>> https://packages.de
OUT OF DATE -- not data
On 1/6/20 9:31 am, Andrew McGlashan via Dng wrote:
> ca-certificates
>
> /usr/bin/aptitude show -t stretch-backports ca-certificates:
> E: Unable to locate package ca-certificates:
>
> https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=stretch-bac
Hi,
ca-certificates
/usr/bin/aptitude show -t stretch-backports ca-certificates:
E: Unable to locate package ca-certificates:
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=stretch-backports&keywords=ca-certificates
Is there any chance of getting a backport of the package in buster without
migrat
Hi,
On 16/3/20 5:51 am, Andrew McGlashan via Dng wrote:
> On 13/3/20 1:59 pm, Steve Litt wrote:
>> It's called POSIX. With POSIX, I always have shellscripts, AWK and sort
>> ready to do my work for me. With POSIX, I can pipe a stdout into the
>> next stdin. With POS
Hi,
On 13/3/20 1:59 pm, Steve Litt wrote:
> It's called POSIX. With POSIX, I always have shellscripts, AWK and sort
> ready to do my work for me. With POSIX, I can pipe a stdout into the
> next stdin. With POSIX, I can plug in anything conforming to POSIX,
> such as dmenu, a genius of a program th
Horrid article that could have been written by pro-systemd Debian devs
themselves.
https://fossforce.com/2020/02/the-verdict-on-systemd-is-in/
Throw your 2pence in, I have; not that I expect my post to actually
remain or remain without a counter attack :(
A.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Hi,
On 3/2/20 9:28 pm, Andrew McGlashan via Dng wrote:
> On 17/1/20 6:37 pm, Mark Hindley wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 06:45:44PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>> Yes, I have been working on this.
>>
>> Attached is the script I have been testing. It single steps th
Hi,
On 17/1/20 6:37 pm, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 06:45:44PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Yes, I have been working on this.
>
> Attached is the script I have been testing. It single steps through.
I've attached a patch file.
AIUI it is better to specifically path /bin/bash r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 1/1/20 6:53 am, fsmithred via Dng wrote:
> On 12/31/19 2:16 PM, Andrew McGlashan via Dng wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 1/1/20 4:20 am, fsmithred via Dng wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 1/1/20 4:20 am, fsmithred via Dng wrote:
> On 12/31/19 12:06 PM, Andrew McGlashan via Dng wrote:
>
>> So how long before we can expect to get stable release of
>> Beowulf? Is there a reasonable timeline available yet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
--
essentially same message,
but with line resizing to help with gpg sig
--
On 31/12/19 12:32 pm, Olaf Meeuwissen via Dng wrote:
> fsmithred via Dng writes:
>> On 12/29/19 10:46 PM, tom wrote:
>>> I know Devuan has been pretty muc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 31/12/19 12:32 pm, Olaf Meeuwissen via Dng wrote:
> fsmithred via Dng writes:
>> On 12/29/19 10:46 PM, tom wrote:
>>> I know Devuan has been pretty much more or less 'to create a
>>> binary compatible Debian but without systemd', but at what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 31/12/19 7:46 am, Steve Litt wrote:
> I didn't hear anyone telling people what to do. I heard Tom ask a
> question.
Tom? I think you meant me ?
Cheers
A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iHUEAREIAB0WIQTJAoMHtC6YydLfjUOoFmvLt+/i+wUCXgt6ogA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/12/19 3:10 pm, terryc wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 23:11:16 +1100 Andrew McGlashan via Dng
> wrote: In my experience, when people who do
> not do the work start telling the people who do do the work, what
> to do, many efforts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 29/12/19 12:01 am, Mark Rousell wrote:
> On 28/12/2019 07:01, Steve Litt wrote:
>> So, if we insist on assisting Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, and their
>> ilk, and all their users, by incorporating DMARC
>
> Really, it's surely not a matter of willing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 28/12/19 9:03 pm, Alexis PM via Dng wrote:
> A mediocre result, neither good nor bad. The best option for people
> who don't want to use systemd, Option 6 "E: Support for multiple
> init systems is Required", came in last. But Option 1 "F: Fo
On 25/12/19 5:17 pm, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Andrew McGlashan via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
>> Although I don't expect to win pissing contests (especially with
>> Rick), I tend to decide that the other opinion /may/ be true or not
>> and simply beg to differ
Hi,
On 19/12/19 10:27 pm, Steve Litt wrote:
> My advice, don't get into a pissing contest with Rick Moen: You'll
> lose. I know, I've lost many times. Rick and I are actually good
> friends, but when we disagree, we get in a pissing contest, and I'm
> always the guy ending up dripping wet.
>
> If
Hi,
On 14/12/19 2:30 pm, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
>
>> According to this message on the Debian-User email message, Debian is
>> working on dumping non-systemd inits.
>
> I continue to be unimpressed by the debian-user mailing list as a source
> of reliab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 27/11/19 7:42 pm, Stephane Ascoet wrote:
> Arnt Karlsen:
>
>> ..you can't (AFAIK), you do it outside your MUA, with e.g.: 'cat
>> $DIGEST |formail +1 -ds procmail '
>
> HI, yes, it was clear that it couldn't be done graphically in
> Thunderbi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Rick,
On 26/11/19 3:22 pm, Rick Moen wrote:
> and just let the two or three users of that mode curse me
> as long as they feel is therapeutic.
Love it! Great way to deal with it.
On 26/11/19 8:33 pm, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..anotherwa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 24/11/19 1:21 am, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..apologies, I just hit the Reply-button and saw you on the
> Cc:-line, and was led to believe that was your intention.
> Responding to this message, I found I had to hit the
> ReplyAll-button to get yo
Hi,
On 23/11/19 4:38 am, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 03:17:58 +1100, Andrew wrote in message
> :
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Jo.
>>
>> On 23/11/19 12:26 am, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote:
>>> In the worst case we would not be able to rely on MX Linu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jo.
On 23/11/19 12:26 am, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote:
> In the worst case we would not be able to rely on MX Linux?
I think not.
MX is not exactly against systemd, they use it still, but not as the
init system. And MX is reliant upon Debian any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Steve,
First off, I fully support your initiative.
On 9/10/19 5:25 pm, Steve Litt wrote:
> I can't give you proof, but I can give a strong piece of evidence:
>
> http://asay.blogspot.com/2006/10/interview-with-red-hat-cto-brian.html
>
I think
42 matches
Mail list logo
