Spam detection software, running on the system tupac2,
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:46:05 +0200
tilt! t...@linuxfoo.de wrote:
I agree with Laurent, the RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK rule weight should
be lowered below treshhold, because
1. it's incorrect to mark a mail as spam solely based on this
criterion, because a significant portion of internet users
My address sometimes gets blocked as coming from a dynamically
assigned IP address, even though the IP address is a static address.
Okay, that's odd. But what could the ISP do about it?
list services that use PBL are not a good idea and serve the interests
that are exactly opposite to the
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 05:20:15PM +0200, Timo Buhrmester wrote:
from my legitimate IP
0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
[82.216.6.62 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
Note the 'dynamic'.
I wouldn't quite take this
On 22/08/2015 16:58, Laurent Bercot wrote:
Spam detection software, running on the system tupac2,
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the
