On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:46:47 +0200
Antonio Rendina via Dng wrote:
> Having control on some open/free source software piece helps you to
> drive the project in the direction that you find more convenient or
> to kill the project the moment that you don't need it anymore.
I've noticed this, and I
On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 16:52:12 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
> Syeed Ali said on Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:31:37 -0700
>
> >Microsoft has a great interest in embracing Linux via WSL with the
> >intent to obsolete the need to dual boot. With many critical
> >distributions and software requiring systemd, it on
Syeed Ali said on Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:31:37 -0700
>Microsoft has a great interest in embracing Linux via WSL with the
>intent to obsolete the need to dual boot. With many critical
>distributions and software requiring systemd, it only makes sense to
>make sure that WSL has complete support; indee
My humblest apologies about inserting the spam header, folks. That was
me having two problems. 1. I wasn't paying attention. 2. I have a
problem with rspamd bouncing more than it should solicited commercial
email and classifying most everything else as spam. I fix the first
problem immediate
I think that every company is just trying to harness the open-source
strength. Nowadays this is a strategical need.
Having control on some open/free source software piece helps you to
drive the project in the direction that you find more convenient or to
kill the project the moment that you don'
On 7/14/22 12:04, Peter Duffy wrote:
[snip]
M$ and IBM haven't always been rivals - worth remembering that
OS/2 was originally a joint venture. Then they decided to go their
separate ways and fork the OS/2 project: IBM carried on developing
OS/2; M$ hacked their version into Windows 95 (remember
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 15:49 -0500, hal wrote:
> On July 13, 2022 3:31:37 PM CDT, Syeed Ali
> wrote:
> :: Microsoft has a great interest in embracing Linux via WSL with the
> :: intent to obsolete the need to dual boot. With many critical
> :: distributions and software requiring systemd, it only
On 14/7/22 4:31 am, Syeed Ali wrote:
Microsoft has a great interest in embracing Linux via WSL with the
intent to obsolete the need to dual boot. With many critical
distributions and software requiring systemd, it only makes sense to
make sure that WSL has complete support; indeed better suppor
On July 13, 2022 3:31:37 PM CDT, Syeed Ali wrote:
:: Microsoft has a great interest in embracing Linux via WSL with the
:: intent to obsolete the need to dual boot. With many critical
:: distributions and software requiring systemd, it only makes sense to
:: make sure that WSL has complete suppor
Microsoft has a great interest in embracing Linux via WSL with the
intent to obsolete the need to dual boot. With many critical
distributions and software requiring systemd, it only makes sense to
make sure that WSL has complete support; indeed better support than on
Linux. Combined Windows and W
The waters do seem very muddy at the moment.
The one thing which seems self-evident is that if Poettering is
continuing to work on systemd, it's not going to be in his spare time -
so that means that it's going to be in the context of M$, and almost
certainly in that of WSL.
I'd give a lot to kno
Let me understand... So, this excellent coder first grabs the
opportunity offered to him by RedHat, and now, after the latter made
him rich, he is leaving them! Please, anyone explain to me, how can
anyone extend a day beyond the usual 24 hours? Systemd is not a simple
game like the many one can f
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:18:29 +0200, Martin wrote in message
<12021771.O9o76ZdvQC@ananda>:
> Peter Duffy - 11.07.22, 11:37:09 CEST:
> > It's an interesting development, and in a strange way it feels as
> > though it's been coming.
> >
> > IBM owns Redhat and M$ owns systemd (Poettering has said t
Peter Duffy - 11.07.22, 11:37:09 CEST:
> It's an interesting development, and in a strange way it feels as
> though it's been coming.
>
> IBM owns Redhat and M$ owns systemd (Poettering has said that he's
> continuing to work on systemd. Presumably that's not going to be in
> his spare time ;) ).
It's an interesting development, and in a strange way it feels as
though it's been coming.
IBM owns Redhat and M$ owns systemd (Poettering has said that he's
continuing to work on systemd. Presumably that's not going to be in his
spare time ;) ). I wonder how that's going to play out. Maybe M$ wil
> On 9 Jul 2022, at 02:07, goli...@devuan.org wrote:
>
> On 2022-07-08 08:57, Steve Litt wrote:
>> What scares me is if he starts putting Microsoft-centric stuff in
>> systemd, Linux will need to either migrate away from systemd or be
>> subsumed by microsoft.
>> SteveT
>
> We'll be there to p
Steve Litt [08/07/2022 15.57]:
What scares me is if he starts putting Microsoft-centric stuff in
systemd, Linux will need to either migrate away from systemd
Wouldn't that be what we all want?
or be
subsumed by microsoft.
Won't happen.
--
Hilsen Harald
Слава Україні!
_
On 2022-07-08 08:57, Steve Litt wrote:
What scares me is if he starts putting Microsoft-centric stuff in
systemd, Linux will need to either migrate away from systemd or be
subsumed by microsoft.
SteveT
We'll be there to pick up the pieces . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . and say "we told you so"
Martin Steigerwald said on Fri, 08 Jul 2022 13:43:30 +0200
>Hi!
>
>How come that I am not surprised?
Me neither. On first seeing the headline, I thought "what's new about
that?", because in my mind redhat is stored in the same compartment as
microsoft and I confuse the two.
>
>I said it back the
Hi!
How come that I am not surprised?
I said it back then already that Systemd adoption followed a similar
pattern to Microsoft's "embrace, extend, and extinguish" tactics. (They
are still following the very same pattern, this time with Office 365.)
Well… I won't miss him. I hope he stops deve
20 matches
Mail list logo
