On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 14:21:04 -0400, zap wrote in message
<4ab545b8-d9ba-e8d4-df1e-fa8a0c73e...@posteo.de>:
> On 07/02/2017 11:09 AM, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Seems like max file size is 40k for the mailing list, so the mail to
> > the list is blocked. zap, did the attached files reach
On 07/02/2017 04:25 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-07-02 at 14:51 -0400, zap wrote:
>> I appear to be getting conflicts, so I must need sysvinit-utils in
>> deb
>> form.
>> this probably is the last thing I need at the moment to make it
>> work...
> Sorry, but you have to show us what c
On Sun, 2017-07-02 at 14:51 -0400, zap wrote:
>
> I appear to be getting conflicts, so I must need sysvinit-utils in
> deb
> form.
> this probably is the last thing I need at the moment to make it
> work...
Sorry, but you have to show us what conflicts you see... And your
/etc/apt/sources.list, a
On 07/02/2017 02:51 PM, zap wrote:
>
> I appear to be getting conflicts, so I must need sysvinit-utils in deb
> form.
> this probably is the last thing I need at the moment to make it work...
Actually, sysvinit-utils and util-linux refuse to upgrade.
I keep getting a dumb error that says:
Error
I appear to be getting conflicts, so I must need sysvinit-utils in deb
form.
this probably is the last thing I need at the moment to make it work...
On 07/02/2017 11:09 AM, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems like max file size is 40k for the mailing list, so the mail to
> the list is blocked
On 07/02/2017 11:09 AM, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems like max file size is 40k for the mailing list, so the mail to
> the list is blocked. zap, did the attached files reach your private
> mail?
Well, I think I received them, unless the ones you sent got shrunk. ;)
> On Sun, 2017-07-02
Hi,
Seems like max file size is 40k for the mailing list, so the mail to
the list is blocked. zap, did the attached files reach your private
mail?
On Sun, 2017-07-02 at 16:59 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-07-01 at 19:54 -0400, zap wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > Hi zap,
> > > >
> > > > As
On 06/30/2017 04:21 PM, zap wrote:
>
> On 06/30/2017 11:21 AM, Svante Signell wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 19:34 -0400, zap wrote:
>>> not really complaining for the most part. But I am curious that's
>>> all.
>>>
>> Hi zap,
>>
>> As I wrote earlier, you can install openrc by:
>> 0) Enable asc
On 07/01/2017 05:32 AM, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 20:12 -0400, zap wrote:
>> It is a little too confusing trying to install openrc at the moment
>> so I
>> will pass for now...
>>
>> It is just a shame that the runit-init package was taken down...
> The instructions are crysta
On 07/01/2017 04:20 AM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 at 00:24:59 +0200
> Didier Kryn wrote:
>
>> Le 30/06/2017 à 23:30, Vincent Bentley a écrit :
>>> Along time ago, well designed and well behaved software could be
>>> recognised by the number of years passed without changes. I w
On 170630-13:16-0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:20:08 +
> Miroslav Rovis wrote:
>
> > On 170629-19:34-0400, zap wrote:
> > > not really complaining for the most part. But I am curious that's
> > > all.
> > I wish I knew better, but, for a simple question of mine today (see
Le 01/07/2017 à 10:20, Alessandro Selli a écrit :
On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 at 00:24:59 +0200
Didier Kryn wrote:
Le 30/06/2017 à 23:30, Vincent Bentley a écrit :
Along time ago, well designed and well behaved software could be
recognised by the number of years passed without changes. I worked at
one
On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 20:12 -0400, zap wrote:
> It is a little too confusing trying to install openrc at the moment
> so I
> will pass for now...
>
> It is just a shame that the runit-init package was taken down...
The instructions are crystal clear...
(And btw: Daniel Reurich is working hard to
On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 at 00:24:59 +0200
Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 30/06/2017 à 23:30, Vincent Bentley a écrit :
> > Along time ago, well designed and well behaved software could be
> > recognised by the number of years passed without changes. I worked at
> > one place that was proud of release version
It is a little too confusing trying to install openrc at the moment so I
will pass for now...
It is just a shame that the runit-init package was taken down...
On 06/30/2017 06:46 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 21:45:23 +0200
> Joachim Fahrner wrote:
>
>> Am 2017-06-30 19:16, schrie
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 21:45:23 +0200
Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> Am 2017-06-30 19:16, schrieb Steve Litt:
>
> > Would it be possible for you to install OpenRC from upstream
> > source? I know that's easily doable with runit or s6, but I know
> > little about OpenRC.
>
> I'm wondering why there are
Le 30/06/2017 à 23:30, Vincent Bentley a écrit :
Along time ago, well designed and well behaved software could be
recognised by the number of years passed without changes. I worked at
one place that was proud of release version birthdays.
Agreed. That's why I'm always bothered with the fast
Along time ago, well designed and well behaved software could be
recognised by the number of years passed without changes. I worked at
one place that was proud of release version birthdays.
On 30/06/17 21:22, zap wrote:
>
>
> On 06/30/2017 03:45 PM, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> I just want to use a
On 06/30/2017 03:45 PM, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> Am 2017-06-30 19:16, schrieb Steve Litt:
>
>> Would it be possible for you to install OpenRC from upstream source? I
>> know that's easily doable with runit or s6, but I know little about
>> OpenRC.
>
> I'm wondering why there are lots of discussio
On 06/30/2017 11:21 AM, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 19:34 -0400, zap wrote:
>> not really complaining for the most part. But I am curious that's
>> all.
>>
> Hi zap,
>
> As I wrote earlier, you can install openrc by:
> 0) Enable ascii in /etc/apt/sources.list
> deb http://auto.m
Am 2017-06-30 19:16, schrieb Steve Litt:
Would it be possible for you to install OpenRC from upstream source? I
know that's easily doable with runit or s6, but I know little about
OpenRC.
I'm wondering why there are lots of discussions about init systems. What
is wrong with sysv init? My note
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:20:08 +
Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> On 170629-19:34-0400, zap wrote:
> > not really complaining for the most part. But I am curious that's
> > all.
> I wish I knew better, but, for a simple question of mine today (see
> my other email of today, and the links to dev1galaxy
On 170630-10:16-0500, goli...@dyne.org wrote:
> On 2017-06-30 09:20, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> >
> > . . . (and although I can log in to GDO, I'm
> > very clumsy at finding out things in there still, to be able to tell
> > you).
> >
>
> I often get to gdo from the dev1galaxy forum:
>
> https://d
On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 19:34 -0400, zap wrote:
> not really complaining for the most part. But I am curious that's
> all.
>
Hi zap,
As I wrote earlier, you can install openrc by:
0) Enable ascii in /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged ascii main
1) add to /etc/apt/sourc
On 2017-06-30 09:20, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
. . . (and although I can log in to GDO, I'm
very clumsy at finding out things in there still, to be able to tell
you).
I often get to gdo from the dev1galaxy forum:
https://dev1galaxy.org/viewforum.php?id=18 (gdo projects)
https://dev1galaxy.org/
On 170629-19:34-0400, zap wrote:
> not really complaining for the most part. But I am curious that's all.
I wish I knew better, but, for a simple question of mine today (see my other
email of today, and the links to dev1galaxy.org post of mine) I only after some
time waiting got a reply...
Some
not really complaining for the most part. But I am curious that's all.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
27 matches
Mail list logo
