On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, KatolaZ wrote:
> I guess you should be more careful when publicly threatening a person
> in this way. The archives of this mailing list are public,
> timestamped, backed up, and freely accessed on the web.
I hope noone is too concerned by the manipulations, lies and threat of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2018-02-15 19:21, Fungal-net wrote:
> AIt seems as obvious now that when amprolla3 tries to merge
> from debian.onion debian has some amprolla like merging system of
> its subrepositories (not all in a single server). Some of them may
> be ti
On 02/15/2018 02:21 PM, Fungal-net wrote:
>
> PS To those asking MORE technical evidence, go to the officially official
> devuan forum and you will find all the specifics. Ask fsmithred to point it
> to you as he was the only one that took attention and tried some things out
> to figure it ou
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 02:21:39PM -0500, Fungal-net wrote:
> If we are talking about the technical problem (which did exist) let's talk
> about the technical problem.
> If we are talking of the political/security problem let's talk about that.
> But don't try to make soup out of what we are tal
If we are talking about the technical problem (which did exist) let's talk
about the technical problem.
If we are talking of the political/security problem let's talk about that. But
don't try to make soup out of what we are talking about, and it is to your
interest to try to understand critici
On Wed, 14 Feb at 2018 20:21:03 -0500
Fungal-net wrote:
> If you are officially representing Devuan and "a long email" described why
> Devuan should not be trusted, I'd say it is your problem the inability to
> read and understand the technical content.
There was actually *no* technical conten
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 08:21:03PM -0500, Fungal-net wrote:
>
> Your response is every proof I needed that there is something fishy going on.
> It may be legal to be deceiving people but the question is whether it is
> ethical and whether once you discover a rat are you responsible to make the
Forwarding to the ML because I messed up the recipient.
On February 15, 2018 4:21:03 AM GMT+03:00, Fungal-net
wrote:
>If you are officially representing Devuan and "a long email" described
>why Devuan should not be trusted, I'd say it is your problem the
>inability to read and understand the tec
Forwarding to the ML because I messed up the recipient.
On February 15, 2018 3:43:30 AM GMT+03:00, Fungal-net
wrote:
>Are you saying now, and this is a new take on explaining the
>unexplainable, and please readers feel free to intervene here and point
>out the obvious to me, what is the problem
Fungal-net,
could you please tone down, and furthermore condense your critique, such
that it can be read and understood?
If you have found a gap in the documentation that causes trouble to
users, please point it out.
Kind regards,
T.
___
Dng mail
If you are officially representing Devuan and "a long email" described why
Devuan should not be trusted, I'd say it is your problem the inability to read
and understand the technical content. If you are really unable to understand
the technical content of this "long email" then you are definete
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 07:43:30PM -0500, Fungal-net wrote:
[cut]
>
> Obviously the way you are handling the response to me is evidence that there
> is something to the story.
>
> PLEASE do not forget to point us to the reference on when was there a public
> announcement that onion address us
Original Message
On February 15, 2018 1:28 AM, KatolaZ wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:24:27PM -0500, Fungal-net wrote:
>>devuanfwojg73k6r.onion and pkgmaster.devuan.org are they and have they ever
>>been the same?
>>
>
> They are the same machine and always have been (sin
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:24:27PM -0500, Fungal-net wrote:
[cut]
>
> PS3 Maybe irrelevant, but could ascii exacerbate some problems as going
> from jessie to ascii packages may have a lower number version in ascii than
> in jessie, which makes the installation different than if it was a str
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:24:27PM -0500, Fungal-net wrote:
> devuanfwojg73k6r.onion and pkgmaster.devuan.org are they and have they ever
> been the same?
>
They are the same machine and always have been (since late September
or early October 2017, more or less). The rewrites on pkgmaster are t
devuanfwojg73k6r.onion and pkgmaster.devuan.org are they and have they ever
been the same?
The reason I am asking is in the past couple of months I witnessed ups and
downs where there were differences and packages existing on one repository
naming scheme and the other differed, making upgrade
16 matches
Mail list logo