Re: [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

2015-01-06 Thread Brett Carr
I strongly support the proposal that a WG Chair serves a term of N years and also cannot serve more than 2 consecutive terms, I also agree with Nick that adding something into the language to make it clear that a previous chair can be re-elected following a set period would be a good move. Brett C

Re: [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

2015-01-06 Thread Piotr Strzyzewski
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 05:33:48PM +, Jim Reid wrote: Dear All > One sticking point appears to be the "A co-chair cannot serve more than 2 > consecutive terms." provision in [2]. Someone commented at the mike at RIPE69 > that this was a good thing. One of your co-chairs says the opposite. E

Re: [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

2015-01-06 Thread Niall O'Reilly
At Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:33:48 +, Jim Reid wrote: > > Happy new year everyone. +1! I suggest replacing these paragraphs > [2] A co-chair will serve a term of N years, where N is the number > of co-chairs. Terms will be staggered so that one term expires every > year. A co-chair cannot serv

Re: [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

2015-01-06 Thread Michael Daly
> On 6 Jan 2015, at 12:41, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > > At Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:33:48 +, > Jim Reid wrote: >> >> Happy new year everyone. > > +1! > > I suggest replacing these paragraphs > >> [2] A co-chair will serve a term of N years, where N is the number >> of co-chairs. Terms will be s