On 07/02/14 08:21, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
Answering my previous question, this behaviour is specified in RFC
6840 para 5.7. Code changes to implement it are in git now.
Have they been comitted? ;-) No visible change here ...
Ooops. Try now.
Am 07.02.2014 09:24, schrieb Simon Kelley:
On 07/02/14 08:21, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
Answering my previous question, this behaviour is specified in RFC
6840 para 5.7. Code changes to implement it are in git now.
Have they been comitted? ;-) No visible change here ...
Ooops. Try now.
Am 07.02.2014 09:24, schrieb Simon Kelley:
On 07/02/14 08:21, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
Answering my previous question, this behaviour is specified in RFC
6840 para 5.7. Code changes to implement it are in git now.
Have they been comitted? ;-) No visible change here ...
Ooops. Try now.
Ooops. Try now.
Very nice, Simon; looks good to me.
-JP
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
I moved forward to test7, and now the FIRST query (the one shipping the
RRSIG and other additional stuff) lacks the AD flag, subsequent
responses carry it.
I cannot confirm that. The first query sets the AD flag (and returns an
RRSIG in the response), and subsequent queries also set AD flag
Am 07.02.2014 09:45, schrieb Matthias Andree:
Am 07.02.2014 09:24, schrieb Simon Kelley:
On 07/02/14 08:21, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
Answering my previous question, this behaviour is specified in RFC
6840 para 5.7. Code changes to implement it are in git now.
Have they been comitted? ;-) No
On 07/02/14 09:25, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
So scrap this report for now, we should check, however, if dnsmasq
forwarding to a second instance of itself works properly. :)
It does! :-)
Many thanks all for your thorough testing. I appreciate it!
Simon.
-JP
DNS Gurus,
With all the excellent work on DNSSEC, I'd like to get this list's thoughts on
the merits of using DNSCrypt.
http://dnscrypt.org/
I cross-compiled dnscrypt-proxy 1.3.3 together with libsodium 0.4.5 from
source, and it works splendidly with our beloved dnsmasq.
FYI, I started
On Feb 7, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck
li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com wrote:
I admit is is nice to know that no-one is silently altering DNS
queries/responses in transit to a trusted DNS server, but is that being
overly paranoid ?
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck
li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com wrote:
On Feb 7, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck
li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com wrote:
I admit is is nice to know that no-one is silently altering DNS
10 matches
Mail list logo