Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Setting multiple tags

2020-08-04 Thread kvaps
Hey, I just found that dnsmasq v2.81 have no such issue. Hooray! Best Regards, Andrei Kvapil On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 6:46 PM kvaps wrote: > > Hi Dominik, > > You can try my docker image for the purity of the experiment: > > # Working (lease issued) > docker run --net=host

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Setting multiple tags

2020-08-04 Thread kvaps
Hi Dominik, You can try my docker image for the purity of the experiment: # Working (lease issued) docker run --net=host -ti --rm --entrypoint=dnsmasq docker.io/kvaps/dnsmasq-controller:v0.5.1 --no-daemon --no-hosts --port=0 --dhcp-broadcast --dhcp-authoritative --dhcp-range=172.16.0.1,static

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Setting multiple tags

2020-08-04 Thread kvaps
with hostname (option ignored) --dhcp-host=02:00:ac:10:00:11,set:foo,set:bar,set:baz,set:poo,set:mee,172.16.0.10,node1,infinite Is it a bug or expected behavior? Best Regards, Andrei Kvapil On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:09 PM kvaps wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 1:36 PM Geert Stappers

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Setting multiple tags

2020-08-04 Thread kvaps
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 1:36 PM Geert Stappers wrote: > Please try > } > --dhcp-host="02:00:ac:10:00:0a,id:*,set:foo:bar:baz,172.16.0.10,node1,infinite > and report back. > No, this format is not working, I also found: > The set: construct sets the tag whenever this --dhcp-host directive is

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Setting multiple tags

2020-08-04 Thread kvaps
Hi! Does dnsmasq support setting multiple tags for the dhcp clients? I'm trying to start dnsmasq with the following option --dhcp-host="02:00:ac:10:00:0a,id:*,set:foo,set:bar,set:baz,172.16.0.10,node1,infinite but it responds: dnsmasq: bad command line options: bad DHCP host name

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] broadcast address equals siaddr

2020-07-28 Thread kvaps
orking: --dhcp-option=option:broadcast,172.16.0.255 numeric one is working fine: --dhcp-option=28,172.16.0.255 Best Regards, Andrei Kvapil On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:27 PM Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:10:11AM +0200, kvaps wrote: > > Hi, > > > >

[Dnsmasq-discuss] broadcast address equals siaddr

2020-06-09 Thread kvaps
Hi, I'm using Dnsmasq version 2.80 from on Alpine Linux 3.11.5 and I faced with the strange issue: When I change the SIADDR option for my pxe-clients, the Broadcast address (option 28) is also changed to the same value. my configuration: # cat /etc/dnsmasq.d/dhcp-opts/ltsp1

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq-controller for Kubernetes

2020-04-21 Thread kvaps
uses leader election to prevent running multiple DHCP-servers in one time. Hopefully you'll find this useful: https://github.com/kvaps/dnsmasq-controller/ - kvaps ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Single-port mode for TFTP

2020-01-06 Thread kvaps
Simon, You're amazing, thank you so much! - kvaps On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 12:06 AM Simon Kelley wrote: > On 30/12/2019 11:51, kvaps wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > We're happy to use dnsmasq for organize network booting in Kubernetes, > > it have everything need: D

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Single-port mode for TFTP

2019-12-31 Thread kvaps
ength 4 This is single port mode: IP 172.17.0.2.56296 > 172.17.0.1.69: 22 RRQ "/some_file" netascii IP 172.17.0.1.69 > 172.17.0.2.56296: 15 DATA block 1 IP 172.17.0.2.56296 > 172.17.0.1.69: 4 ACK block 1 - kvaps On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 8:45 AM Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Mon,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Single-port mode for TFTP

2019-12-30 Thread kvaps
://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/26718 On Tue, Dec 31, 2019, 07:20 john doe wrote: > On 12/30/2019 6:34 PM, kvaps wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 2:42 PM john doe wrote: > > > >> Isn't the below flag what you want from (1): > >> > >> "--tftp-po

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Single-port mode for TFTP

2019-12-30 Thread kvaps
> dnsmasq -d --enable-tftp --tftp-port-range=1069,1069 No way, because in this case it should also listen on 1069 port. - kvaps On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 9:11 PM Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 06:36:49PM +0100, kvaps wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 2:42 PM joh

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Single-port mode for TFTP

2019-12-30 Thread kvaps
ange=69,69 It reports an error: dnsmasq-tftp: unable to get free port for TFTP when I try to download any file from it - kvaps ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Single-port mode for TFTP

2019-12-30 Thread kvaps
. In this way, the TFTP-packets can be simple NAT'ed back to the client side. Take a look on unique features for go-tftp implementation: https://github.com/vcabbage/go-tftp#unique-features And its command line client: https://github.com/kvaps/trivialt/ Best regards - kvaps