On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:40:37PM +0100, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 08:39:28PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 19/02/2021 12:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 18.02.21 22:50, Simon Kelley wrote:
> >> That wiki page is just word-soup as far as I am
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:01:00AM -0400, Dominick C. Pastore wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021, at 4:52 AM, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:40:37PM +0100, Geert Stappers via
> > Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 08:39:28PM +, Simon
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021, at 4:52 AM, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:40:37PM +0100, Geert Stappers via
> Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 08:39:28PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > > On 19/02/2021 12:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > > On
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:40:37PM +0100, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 08:39:28PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > On 19/02/2021 12:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > On 18.02.21 22:50, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > >> That wiki page is just word-soup as far as
On 21.02.21, 21:54, "Dnsmasq-discuss on behalf of Simon Kelley"
wrote:
> OK. It's set. Looking for feedback, good and bad.
>
> Simon.
My latest '[PATCH v5] Connection track mark based DNS query filtering.'
email did no longer get filtered into the junk folder, so I think the
settings may be
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 08:39:28PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 19/02/2021 12:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 18.02.21 22:50, Simon Kelley wrote:
> >> That wiki page is just word-soup as far as I am concerned. Does setting
> >> dmarc_moderation_action to "munge from" fix Etan's
On 19/02/2021 12:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 17/02/2021 13:54, Etan Kissling wrote:
> When submitting a patch I noticed that the Dnsmasq mailing list
> modifies
> the subject of the email (prefix [Dnsmasq-discuss]) as well as appends
> 'Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list'
On 17/02/2021 13:54, Etan Kissling wrote:
When submitting a patch I noticed that the Dnsmasq mailing list modifies
the subject of the email (prefix [Dnsmasq-discuss]) as well as appends
'Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list' information to the end of my message.
These modifications break DKIM
On 18/02/2021 12:47, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 17/02/2021 13:54, Etan Kissling wrote:
>>> When submitting a patch I noticed that the Dnsmasq mailing list modifies
>>> the subject of the email (prefix [Dnsmasq-discuss]) as well as appends
>>> 'Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list' information to
On 17/02/2021 13:54, Etan Kissling wrote:
When submitting a patch I noticed that the Dnsmasq mailing list modifies
the subject of the email (prefix [Dnsmasq-discuss]) as well as appends
'Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list' information to the end of my message.
These modifications break DKIM
On 17.02.21, 23:48, "Simon Kelley" wrote:
> > When submitting a patch I noticed that the Dnsmasq mailing list modifies
> > the subject of the email (prefix [Dnsmasq-discuss]) as well as appends
> > 'Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list' information to the end of my message.
>
> There's no particular
On 17/02/2021 13:54, Etan Kissling wrote:
> When submitting a patch I noticed that the Dnsmasq mailing list modifies
> the subject of the email (prefix [Dnsmasq-discuss]) as well as appends
> 'Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list' information to the end of my message.
>
> These modifications break DKIM
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 02:54:46PM +0100, Etan Kissling wrote:
> When submitting a patch I noticed that the Dnsmasq mailing list modifies
> the subject of the email (prefix [Dnsmasq-discuss]) as well as appends
> 'Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list' information to the end of my message.
>
> These
When submitting a patch I noticed that the Dnsmasq mailing list modifies
the subject of the email (prefix [Dnsmasq-discuss]) as well as appends
'Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list' information to the end of my message.
These modifications break DKIM signatures of our emails, leading to them
being
14 matches
Mail list logo
