On 01/03/12 00:30, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:05:41PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
The DHCPv6 code is looking pretty good now (thanks all testers).
So good, in fact, that I think it's time to start moving gently
towards a release. I've just created 2.60rc1, available at
Just a
Dnia 2012-02-29, o godz. 18:30:57
/dev/rob0 napisał(a):
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:05:41PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > The DHCPv6 code is looking pretty good now (thanks all testers).
> >
> > So good, in fact, that I think it's time to start moving gently
> > towards a release. I've just c
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:05:41PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> The DHCPv6 code is looking pretty good now (thanks all testers).
>
> So good, in fact, that I think it's time to start moving gently
> towards a release. I've just created 2.60rc1, available at
Just a thought ... having added DHCPv6
On 29/02/12 08:05, Vladislav Grishenko wrote:
Same hit here, but due TOP variable is already exported from up-level
Makefile
I have source tree with packages and one general Makefile:
src/dnsmasq/...
src/Makefile
export TOP := $(shell pwd)
dnsmasq:
$(MAKE) -C $@
So, had to change it to $(M
> To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: release candidate dnsmasq-
> 2.60rc1
>
> On 29/02/12 03:18, Preston Crow wrote:
> > I hit a Makefile issue (that wasn't there in dnsmasq-2.60test10):
> >
> > # pmake way to learn path of Make
On 29/02/12 03:18, Preston Crow wrote:
I hit a Makefile issue (that wasn't there in dnsmasq-2.60test10):
# pmake way to learn path of Makefile
TOP != echo `pwd`/
# GNU make way to learn path of Makefile
TOP ?= $(shell pwd)
This leads to:
Makefile:38: *** missing separator. Stop.
Apparently it
I hit a Makefile issue (that wasn't there in dnsmasq-2.60test10):
# pmake way to learn path of Makefile
TOP != echo `pwd`/
# GNU make way to learn path of Makefile
TOP ?= $(shell pwd)
This leads to:
Makefile:38: *** missing separator. Stop.
Apparently it doesn't like the first TOP line.
I mi
