Hi Dean,
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 01:15:56PM -0500, Dean Anderson wrote:
This is nearly a straight rehash of the ill-fated in-addr draft.
Since as a matter of history it's a revival of that draft under a
different filename (as some people objected to the required), that
shouldn't be too
At 13:15 -0500 1/4/07, Dean Anderson wrote:
address by the machine initiating the query. This incorrect assertion
is at the very heart of the mistaken uses of 'reverse DNS as security
mechanism'. The correct answer to what is supposed to be seen is
_site_ dependent. Those who think there is
