I think it would be instructive for someone to do a measurement
exercise on a root server and identify what proportion of non-junk
queries are made with EDNS0.
I will try to analyze 48hour trace of M-Root taken in January this
year.
Couple of things:
- what is the definition of non-junk
On 24-Jul-2007, at 12:53, Akira Kato wrote:
I think it would be instructive for someone to do a measurement
exercise on a root server and identify what proportion of non-junk
queries are made with EDNS0.
I will try to analyze 48hour trace of M-Root taken in January this
year.
Couple of
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:53:12PM -0500, Dave Crocker wrote:
As we've discussed privately, this seems to be a relatively straightforward
trade-off between cleanliness of the design versus number of tables that
IANA will have to maintain. But by straightforward, I mean that
understanding
Hi John,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 10:08:54AM -0500, John Schnizlein wrote:
contribution, and do not intend to delay it. I think the reference
to RFC 2505 might fit properly in the history section. My reason for
advocating inclusion is like my reason for supporting the history
section
Dear colleagues,
Stephane Bortzmeyer pointed out to me this morning a problem in what
section 2.1 of the -04 draft says. Here's how it reads now:
Since the list of trusted hosts was a simple list of hostnames or
addresses, an attacker could acquire access by intercepting the DNS
query
