> Dear colleagues,
>
> Not to pick on Mark, but I have the sinking feeling that this
> discussion is a good example of why some operators think the IETF
> doesn't understand operational problems.
>
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 10:07:54AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > I said COPY. I did not
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> non-IANA-root entries. This scheme more or less guarantees the end of
> the pretense of a unified namespace (which is related, I think,
> to the arguments elsewhere in this thread that such has already
> happened anyway)
Dear colleagues,
Not to pick on Mark, but I have the sinking feeling that this
discussion is a good example of why some operators think the IETF
doesn't understand operational problems.
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 10:07:54AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> I said COPY. I did not say "THEIR OWN R
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Sebastian Castro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 01:51:54PM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote:
> > At 10:35 -0700 4/1/08, Sebastian Castro Avila wrote:
> >
> > >Sorry for the late response. About this matter, using the data collected
> > >at the root server instances participating in
