On 8 Mar 2009, at 03:57, Måns Nilsson wrote:
I mean, that for the (previously alleged to be more interesting wrt
IDN)
ccTLD part of the name space, ISO 3166, with its (at least actual if
not
formal) limitation to two characters from A-Z, should fix the
issue of
IDNA in TLD labels, leaving
Does not ISO3166 solve that problem for us with regards to allowed
characters in the TLD label?
No. The alpha-2 used for ccTLD labels (and also the alpha-3) codes
are restricted to the set A-Z.
jaap
___
DNSOP mailing list
--On söndag, söndag 8 mar 2009 10.59.16 +0100 Jaap Akkerhuis
j...@nlnetlabs.nl wrote:
Does not ISO3166 solve that problem for us with regards to allowed
characters in the TLD label?
No. The alpha-2 used for ccTLD labels (and also the alpha-3) codes
are restricted to the set
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 07:40:46PM +0100, Patrik Fältström wrote:
The problem with writing exact objective rules is that with the 6000
languages, and enormous number of codepoints, it is extremely hard to
create say a regular expression that we know is _absolutely_ correct
regarding
