Roy Arends wrote:
I find it worrying that folks intend to test or practice operational
procedures by doing it often on a live production system. What if that
test or practice fails? Whoops, we were testing it on the live system,
we failed, good thing we called it a test
There is also a risk
On Oct 7, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
From this perspective we might roll a ZSK more frequently than a
KSK because
the ZSK needs to be stored on-line to facilitate re-signing when
the zone
changes. With the KSK we have the option of keeping it off-line, and
arguably the risk
On 06/10/09 03:30, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses which
are not globally unique. Examples are the addresses designated in
RFC1918 for private use within individual sites.
Should this be extended to include RFC4193 unique local
On 2009-10-08, at 17:13, Chris Hills wrote:
On 06/10/09 03:30, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses which
are not globally unique. Examples are the addresses designated in
RFC1918 for private use within individual sites.
Should
Doug Barton wrote:
Roy Arends wrote:
I find it worrying that folks intend to test or practice operational
procedures by doing it often on a live production system. What if that
test or practice fails? Whoops, we were testing it on the live system,
we failed, good thing we called it a test
In message fa3f9a93-eaf3-4142-8a33-ba7e72f88...@hopcount.ca, Joe Abley writes
:
On 2009-10-08, at 17:13, Chris Hills wrote:
On 06/10/09 03:30, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses which
are not globally unique. Examples are
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Joe Abley wrote:
Should this be extended to include RFC4193 unique local ipv6 unicast
addresses (i.e. [cd].f.ip6.arpa.)?
I seem to remember having that discussion a long time ago, maybe in concert
with discussion of marka's local-zones draft.
It was the Prague IETF in
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Chris Hills wrote:
On 06/10/09 03:30, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses which
are not globally unique. Examples are the addresses designated in
RFC1918 for private use within individual sites.
Should this be
