Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-kumari-ogud-dnsop-cds-02.txt

2013-07-11 Thread Jim Lahey
Hello for the first time! I'm a bit new to this IETF stuff, but a long time "participant" in the world of DNS. I was pointed to this list by a friend, and in reading some of the more recent threads I felt compelled to jump in (I hope this sort of participation is copacetic). On Tue, 9 Jul 20

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-kumari-ogud-dnsop-cds-02.txt

2013-07-11 Thread John Dickinson
On 8 Jul 2013, at 18:03, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: > John, > > Thanks for a excellent and timely review we just about pushing out a new > version when it arrived. > > We have accepted most of your edits and suggestions except when the text was > already removed/reworded. > > Instead I wan

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-kumari-ogud-dnsop-cds-02.txt

2013-07-11 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Jul 11, 2013, at 3:54 AM, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > I've given Ed's words a really good thought, and slept a night over it. > I think the reason why some of us don't feel comfortable with many of > the assumptions in our requirements is because we try to avoid a > framework we as technician

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-kumari-ogud-dnsop-cds-02.txt

2013-07-11 Thread Antoin Verschuren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Op 10-07-13 15:19, Edward Lewis schreef: > These are concerns that are not well defined and I've off and on > tried to find a more rigorous framework from which to hang them. > But Antoin sums up the "operator" view that - the world is more > complica