but, separately from that, if PTR's have high and low uses, we should
document that, so that NYT (or whomever) ...
Can whoever mentioned the NY Times offer more clues about what they're
rejecting? My cable connection happens to have IPv6 with no rDNS, and
I can't even find a v6 address at the
ebersman I don't even know how many broken sites there are and I don't
ebersman care to waste valuable staff time tilting at this
ebersman windmill. ...
vixie no worries. meanwhile i'm going to try to build an internet that
vixie can grow for 200 more years.
Suddenly being socially responsible
(no hats)
On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:53 AM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Paul Ebersman list-dn...@dragon.net wrote:
I'd hope it would be good operational sense for folks to have automated
checks of critical things and checks of DNS logs for DNSSEC
ebersman So your grand scheme is
vixie decorum?
No objections here if you succeed. :)
ebersman ... to limit who can get v6 PTRs and that will be the new
ebersman standard of whether or now you're tall enough to send email
ebersman with the big boys?
vixie yes.
Well, for my $DAYJOB, that's
knowing its not the root issue, I would like to remind people the RIR
system for rDNS delegation is almost entirely automatic from our various
portals, and WHOIS based nserver mechanisms. Its not hard to do the top
part. We're not roadblocking.
We don't have any failure to delegate the parent
