+1
(privacy response is with all, and this specific issue is not an amplification
one)
Hugo Connery,
Technical University of Denmark
From: DNSOP [dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Paul Vixie [p...@redbarn.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 March 2015 01:35
To:
Akira Kato and I submitted draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse.
If you have interests, please comment.
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-00.txt
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 10:20:47 -0700
A new version of I-D,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Shumon,
On 09/03/15 21:17, Shumon Huque wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Shumon Huque shu...@gmail.com
mailto:shu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Robert Edmonds edmo...@mycre.ws
mailto:edmo...@mycre.ws wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Brian Dickson brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey, everyone,
[snip]
dig-friendly.
Okay, thinking about this a bit more...
Recursive vs authoritative, RD=0 vs RD=1.
In all combinations of the above, do the new thing, except for one corner
case:
if(RD==1
Hi All,
Thanks for responding one response per user. Apologies for
cross-posting.
*Access*: All
*Close date*: 03/04/2015
*Survey*:
https://fr.surveymonkey.com/r/zonemasterhttps://centr.org/survey-form/dns-checking-tools-ed-2014
*Background*: Afnic and IIS.SE are currently in the
On Mar 10, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote:
On Mar 10, 2015, at 8:46 AM, David C Lawrence t...@akamai.com wrote:
Paul Hoffman writes:
On Mar 10, 2015, at 6:25 AM, Yunhong Gu g...@google.com wrote:
So the problem is, why NOTIMP? REFUSED sounds like a better
Wessels, Duane mailto:dwess...@verisign.com
Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:19 AM
As Paul suggests, I'll attempt to redirect the conversation to dnsop.
Does it make sense to define an Extended RCODE for additional signaling?
e.g. REFUSED_BECAUSE_QTYPE_ANY
no, because the problem is with
