Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

On 10/28/15 7:37 AM, yaojk wrote: Hello http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/agenda?item=agenda-94-dnsop.html From the agenda above, I see that it doesn't include my draft discussion. Could you kindly assignee 5 minutes to introduce the draft- yao-dnsop-root-cache？ Thanks Jiankang Yao Hi

Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

> 在 2015年10月28日，19:45，Tim Wicinski 写道： > > > > >> On 10/28/15 7:37 AM, yaojk wrote: >> Hello >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/agenda?item=agenda-94-dnsop.html >> >> From the agenda above, I see that it doesn't include my draft >> discussion. Could you kindly

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance & support for local DNS views: IPR issues

Petr, I'm not sure how this was overlooked but we'll sort it out and get you a response before the DNSOP f2f in Yokohama next week. Thank you for being willing to work on resolving it, and our apologies for not getting it in hand sooner. best, Suzanne (for the chairs) On Oct 23, 2015, at

Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

Hello, AD here. On 10/28/15 5:24 AM, yaojk wrote: > > > > >> 在 2015年10月28日，19:45，Tim Wicinski 写道： >> >> >> >> >>> On 10/28/15 7:37 AM, yaojk wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/agenda?item=agenda-94-dnsop.html >>> >>> From the agenda above, I see that

Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

Thanks, Joel. As Joel points out for those who may not know-- the decision not to add this draft to the agenda for the f2f meeting next week is within the discretion of the WG chairs. However, in the interests of transparency, we have no problem explaining the decision. THe draft

Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

On 10/28/15 4:24 AM, yaojk wrote: It might be your power as chairman. But I think that your arguments to block the draft discussion is not reasonable. If I may take some liberty here ... discussion of the draft is not blocked. Indeed, the primary place for working group discussions to take

Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yao-dnsop-root-cache-00.txt

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Shane Kerr wrote: > Jiankang Yao, > > I think a simpler approach that works in general is the "HAMMER" > approach proposed by Warren Kumari, Roy Arends, and Suzanne Woolf a > couple of years ago: > >

Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yao-dnsop-root-cache-00.txt

Bob Harold wrote: > Reading these various ideas brings up a question in my mind. If a server > queries for the SOA of a zone and the serial number has not changed, can it > then assume that all of the entries in its cache for that zone should still > be valid now, and for the their original TTL