Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

2016-08-15 Thread 神明達哉
At Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:01:52 +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > There is nothing wrong with existing resolvers that use the same > timeout and retransmission strategies for priming queries as for any > other query, and it seems wrong to me that a specific retransmission >

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-00.txt

2016-08-15 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF. Title : DNS Session Signaling Authors : Ray Bellis Stuart Cheshire

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

2016-08-15 Thread Marek Vavruša
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On 5 Aug 2016, at 2:45, Shane Kerr wrote: > >> First, we have: >> >> "If a priming query does not get a response within 2 seconds, the >> recursive resolver SHOULD retry with a different target address from >> the

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

2016-08-15 Thread Warren Kumari
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On 5 Aug 2016, at 2:45, Shane Kerr wrote: > >> First, we have: >> >> "If a priming query does not get a response within 2 seconds, the >> recursive resolver SHOULD retry with a different target address from >> the

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-01.txt

2016-08-15 Thread Warren Kumari
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Bob Harold wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: >> >> We have updated this document with comments and feedback from Berlin. >> We have also gone through and done another editing pass, removing a

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-01.txt

2016-08-15 Thread Bob Harold
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > We have updated this document with comments and feedback from Berlin. > We have also gone through and done another editing pass, removing a > significant amount of text which was intended to drive the discussion, > but

Re: [DNSOP] Definitions of basic DNSSEC terms

2016-08-15 Thread Edward Lewis
On 8/10/16, 20:55, "Paul Hoffman" wrote: >That seems like a categorization, not a definition. Or are there >definitions that involve "local policy" you or Ed can propose? I've given this some thought and am a bit conflicted. On the one hand, the intent of DNSSEC