[DNSOP] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-08-28 Thread Ben Campbell
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-08-28 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Paul, On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 2:52 PM Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Spencer Dawkins < > spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In this text, > > > > 2. Names > > > > ... > > > > The common display format is used in applications and free text. > > It is the

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-08-28 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > In this text, > > 2. Names > > ... > > The common display format is used in applications and free text. > It is the same as the presentation format, but showing the root > label and the "." before it is optional and is rarel

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-08-28 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Aug 27, 2018, at 3:59 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > First off, thank you all for the effort that went into this document -- it's > quite helpful to have a central resource to refer to. > > I agree with Mirja about further clarity for the 2308 updates being nice, and > about the "primary master"

[DNSOP] Deborah Brungard's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-08-28 Thread Deborah Brungard
Deborah Brungard has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-08-28 Thread Mirja Kühlewind
Hi Paul, I leave the decision about the update to the wg and responsible AD, however, if you decide to keep it, maybe you can just rephrase a bit to make sure that it is very clear the definition is this doc is the current one. Mirja On 26.08.2018 03:11, Paul Hoffman wrote: Thanks for th