Hi Jinmei,
Thanks for your comments. I once had same questions in my mind when this
draft is conceived. I reply inline.
Some quick observations:
>
> - I don't see why the intended status is Standards Track. It seems to
> be a document about an operational practice rather than a new
>
> On Sep 24, 2018, at 11:14 AM, 神明達哉 wrote:
>
> At Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:31:50 +0800,
> Davey Song wrote:
>
> > I just submited a new draft intending to provide better connectivity from
> > network side function . Comments are welcome.
>
> Some quick observations:
>
> - I don't see why the
At Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:31:50 +0800,
Davey Song wrote:
> I just submited a new draft intending to provide better connectivity from
> network side function . Comments are welcome.
Some quick observations:
- I don't see why the intended status is Standards Track. It seems to
be a document
Hi,
I am an administrator of DNS resolvers to Djibouti Telecom.
I updated the root key to our DNS resolvers servers. Is there a way to tell if
DNSSEC is using the last trusted anchor ( Update on the Root KSK Rollover
Project) ?
# dig @127.0.0.1 dnssec-failed.org a +dnssec
Link:
Hi. Thanks for the detailed comments.
Some responses...
On 9/24/2018 3:00 AM, Francesca Palombini wrote:
The use of underscored node names is specific to each RRTYPE that is
being scoped.
As an non-expert in the area, I would have appreciate a ref to a document
introducing RRTYPE.
Reviewer: Francesca Palombini
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.