On 10/18/2018 12:04 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
Dave has stated that he is unwilling to do this work. Instead of having
the WG document simply stall, Benno and I have agreed that we would
split them between us. If anyone would like to volunteer to help out, we
would not take it amiss.
Please not
Hi there,
Dave suggested I send this out.
draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf and draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix have completed
IESG review.
Alissa is holding a DISCUSS position on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix -
this can be seen here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix/ballot/
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please r
On 10/17/18 11:18 PM, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote:
> 4. In my opinion, Ed25519 is best algorithm some yars later.
>If the document describes both current RECOMMENDATIONS and
>RECOMMENDATIONS some years later, we can plan.
I agree, but the last paragraph of 3.1 seems to express that already:
