On 10/17/18 11:18 PM, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote: > 4. In my opinion, Ed25519 is best algorithm some yars later. > If the document describes both current RECOMMENDATIONS and > RECOMMENDATIONS some years later, we can plan.
I agree, but the last paragraph of 3.1 seems to express that already: > It is expected that ED25519 will become the future RECOMMENDED default > algorithm once there's enough support for this algorithm in the > deployed DNSSEC validators. Do you mean that "expected future recommendations" should be made more visible in a separate section or something? --Vladimir _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
