On 01. 07. 19 22:21, Paul Vixie wrote:
> On Monday, 1 July 2019 18:00:09 UTC Paul Wouters wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Petr Špaček wrote:
>>
>> [broken record on]
>>
>>> ...
>>
>> The internet does not do "flag days". Please stop calling it flag days.
>> ...
>
> "flag day" is a power word. the
At Sat, 29 Jun 2019 22:55:07 +,
Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > - I think the RESINFO RDATA specification (at least its wire format,
> > and preferably also the presentation format) should be more clearly
> > specified. At least to me it was not very clear, and I'm afraid
> > this can lead to
On Monday, 1 July 2019 18:00:09 UTC Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Petr Špaček wrote:
>
> [broken record on]
>
> > ...
>
> The internet does not do "flag days". Please stop calling it flag days.
> ...
"flag day" is a power word. the organizers of the 2019 event have tasted
power,
Hi Paul,
> On Jul 1, 2019, at 14:00, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Petr Špaček wrote:
>
> [broken record on]
>
>> I would only add reference to
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile/
>> + DNS Flag Day 2020, which is going to effectivelly kill UDP
>>
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Petr Špaček wrote:
[broken record on]
I would only add reference to
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile/
+ DNS Flag Day 2020, which is going to effectivelly kill UDP
fragmentation in DNS and thus require TCP for perfect operation.
The internet
Hello,
it is a good read.
I would only add reference to
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile/
+ DNS Flag Day 2020, which is going to effectivelly kill UDP
fragmentation in DNS and thus require TCP for perfect operation.
Maybe we could add something along these lines
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Morris wrote:
>
> Back in March, Martin Hoffman did a comprehensive review of the
> RFC2845bis draft and made a number of very good suggestions for
> improvements to its readability. I've edited the draft to take
> account of his comments, something that has had a
