Reviewer: Scott Bradner
Review result: Ready
This is an OPS-DIR review of Extended DNS Errors
This ID defines a use of the EDNS0 extension mechanism that can be used by a
DNS resolver to provide additional detail about DNS lookup issues as well as
defining an initial set of 24 codes that can be
I originally sent this to the list last July. Olafur provided some feedback
(which has been incorporated into the text suggested below), but it seems to
have slipped past the document editors. Trying again since the document has
been revived after it recently expired...
I've recently been readi
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Reviewer: Catherine Meadows
Review result: Has Issues
This ID defines an extensible method to return information about the cause of
DNS errors. It extends both the type of response that can contain error
messages and the type of messages that can be returned, and includes mechanisms
that can be u
On Mar 31, 2020, at 6:34 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott
wrote:
>
> I originally sent this to the list last July. Olafur provided some feedback
> (which has been incorporated into the text suggested below), but it seems to
> have slipped past the document editors. Trying again since the document has
>
[ - last-call@, for clutter, +Barry]
Thank you for the review, Scott.
As I'm an author on this, I am recusing myself from balloting, and so
am CCing the responsible AD (Barry Leiba) so he has a copy of it...
W
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:23 AM Scott Bradner via Datatracker
wrote:
>
> Reviewer:
Donald Eastlake writes:
> > I also do not add the "reserved" section since the IANA ranges were
> > discussed extensively and the current number ranges are the result of a
> > consensus I didn't want to have one person change without a lot of
> > backup agreement.
>
> This is the only serious pr
Eric Orth writes:
> > "Because long EXTRA-TEXT fields may trigger truncation,
> > which is undesirable given the supplemental nature of
> > EDE."
>
> I left this sentence as a hybrid of what you suggested (removing most of
> the second half), leaving in the supplemental
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more informatio
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 8767
Title: Serving Stale Data to Improve DNS Resiliency
Author: D. Lawrence,
W. Kumari,
P. Sood
Status: Standards Track
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 PM Pete Resnick via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04
> Reviewer: Pete Resnick
> Review Date: 2020-03-31
> Summary: Ready.
>
> Good to go. A straightforward document easy enough for this non-expert to
> get.
>
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
P
Thank you Murray.
Nits addressed in our repo ( https://github.com/shuque/multi-provider-dnssec
) and queued for next revision.
Shumon.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:58 PM Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> d
13 matches
Mail list logo
