Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sahib-domain-verification-techniques-02.txt

2021-06-10 Thread Paul Wouters
Thanks for doing this work! I’ve read this a while ago when you gave me a preview and this is important work that you should present at the next IETF and hopefully we can adopt and put though reasonably fast - the market needs our guidance. (For those who think there is no problem, dig txt cnn.

[DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sahib-domain-verification-techniques-02.txt

2021-06-10 Thread Shivan Kaul Sahib
Hi all, Shumon and I have been working on an early draft that surveys current DNS domain verification techniques. Depending on how it goes, we hope to eventually explore if we can come up with some best practices. We plan to ask for time to present it at the IETF 111 DNSOP meeting. In the meantime

[DNSOP] Mapping IANA deprecated to YANG status deprecated [was RE: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]

2021-06-10 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Hi DNS Ops, Warren, Lada and I discussed this further today. Warren and I think that mapping IANA deprecated to YANG deprecated is the right behaviour here, and Lada is fine with either outcome. The main concern of mapping from IANA 'deprecated' to YANG 'status obsolete' is that it would fo

Re: [DNSOP] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-06-10 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" writes: > Hi Lada, > > I've also copied Michelle on - since I think that it would be helpful for > IANA to at least be aware of this discussion. > > Sorry for being slow to get back to you. I've expanded on my discuss comment > below, but it may be helpful for you, Warre

Re: [DNSOP] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-06-10 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Hi Lada, I've also copied Michelle on - since I think that it would be helpful for IANA to at least be aware of this discussion. Sorry for being slow to get back to you. I've expanded on my discuss comment below, but it may be helpful for you, Warren, I, possibly Michelle, to have a quick cha