All
The call for adoption has ended with consensus to adopt this work. Thanks
for the feedback.
We'll work with the authors on a version with the updated aame, and in a
few weeks we are considering
another drafts - send suggestions to the chairs.
thanks
tim
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 8:53 PM
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 8:43 AM Shumon Huque wrote:
> I support adoption too.
>
>
Me too. Support. Happy to review or contribute. (Not a lie.)
Brian
> As I've mentioned earlier, this mechanism is widely deployed and needs a
> published specification. Adopting the work will also allow us to
I prefer option 2. I think it fulfills the implicit obligations
inherent in 1) -which would be to fill the hole of uncertainty. Its
succinct, and it covers the cases I think define the condition.
I would ask if 2) also needs to define ".. or cannot be resolved"
because "[or not at all]" is a bit
(speaking as a chair)
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 5:22 PM John R Levine wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2023, Miek Gieben wrote:
> >> I think it's an interesting idea but I also don't want to spend time on
> it
> >> if it's just going to be filed and forgotten.
> >
> > I looked into this for
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023, Miek Gieben wrote:
I think it's an interesting idea but I also don't want to spend time on it
if it's just going to be filed and forgotten.
I looked into this for https://github.com/miekg/dns
The option is trivial to implemented (in an auth server). I.e. seems similar
to
Dear WG,
The WGLC was closed for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis, and the discussion
on lame delegation did not find consensus, but two specific suggestions
were put forward. We would like to include one of them in rfc8499bis if
we can get consensus to do so.
The chairs are seeking input on the
[ Quoting in "Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dns..." ]
It appears that Suzanne Woolf said:
Colleagues,
This email begins a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-02
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion/).
If you've reviewed this document and
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 5:18 PM, John Scudder wrote:
> John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-23: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
It appears that Suzanne Woolf said:
>Colleagues,
>
>
>This email begins a Working Group Last Call for
>draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-02
>(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion/).
>
>If you've reviewed this document and think it's ready for publication, please
>let us
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 23:07, Suzanne Woolf <[swo...@pir.org](mailto:On Wed,
Apr 26, 2023 at 23:07, Suzanne Woolf < wrote:
> This email begins a Working Group Last Call for
> draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-02
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion/).
>
> If you've
10 matches
Mail list logo
