Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLD's to perform checks.

2015-11-11 Thread Lawrence Conroy
Hi Patrik, Jim, folks, +1 Not an IETF thing, but ISTR that the RRR model can make pushing error reports difficult: e.g., if Registry runs tests and finds problems, the Registrar may be unhappy for an email to be sent from Registry direct to "the Registrar's" customer. Quite apart from

Re: [DNSOP] TLD, ccTLD and gTLD, agreement with the consensus (Was: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-01.txt

2015-05-04 Thread Lawrence Conroy
Hi Dan, Stephane, Andrew, Ed, folks, I also prefer Ed Lewis' variant **. Enumerating all flavours of TLD would be excessive, but mentioning only gTLDs and ccTLDs -without a hint that there may be other variants- is a false friend, IMHO. Hence please can we go for the version with and other

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-01.txt

2015-04-29 Thread Lawrence Conroy
On 29 Apr 2015, at 21:36, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote: On Apr 29, 2015, at 1:26 PM, Jaap Akkerhuis j...@nlnetlabs.nl wrote: Paul Hoffman writes: Country is a term of art in politics. There are definitions that most people agree to, at least when it suits them. RFC 1591

[DNSOP] Passive DNS COF

2014-03-07 Thread Lawrence Conroy
Hi Chaps, stupid quick question, listening to the stream: How does this work with CDNs (I think you may need to capture the IP address; bailiwick could act as a proxy for that, but ...) all the best, Lawrence ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org

Re: [DNSOP] Data model and field names for DNS in JSON or XML

2012-01-18 Thread Lawrence Conroy
On 18 Jan 2012, at 19:41, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:14:27PM +, Paul Vixie p...@redbarn.org wrote a message of 74 lines which said: in particular, the order in which it's probed (compared to EDNS0 UDP, EDNS0 TCP, old style UDP, old style TCP) should be

Re: [DNSOP] [dnsext] [mif] 2nd Last Call for MIF DNS server selection document

2011-10-24 Thread Lawrence Conroy
Hi there Doug, Keith, folks, Speaking of broken mechanisms ... how many dots? arstechnica.com is OK co.uk is not OK ndots strikes me as a chocolate soldier in the fire used to warm the chocolate teapot that is search lists. At best these are context dependent (and keep IT support in