I agree it would greatly help to include the more precise terms.
Note that Scott's current EPP draft is still using this term,
citing the definition in 1912. Should the term be removed from
Scott's draft, or acknowledged that it is now historic?
If Scott replaces it with another more precise
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 01:41:28PM +, Edward Lewis wrote:
> However, after the discussion in the interim meeting, I don't think there's
> any need to "replace" lame delegation with anything as the situation I've
> seen it used in no longer is a topic of discussion, except when we are
>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:20:12PM -0400, Livingood, Jason wrote:
Great and detailed feedback on our first draft, Andrew. I'll take a reply
in detail, point-by-point, when I start working on -01 with my co-authors
and contributors.
Thanks
Jason
jason
andrew pretty much covered it
many of you have already heard about it, but we want to remind
folks of the 'day in the life of the Internet' 2008 experiment:
we're trying to coordinate dns (and possibly other types of)
measurements from a single (2)day period in mid-march 2008.
we will repeat our simultaneous root server
