On Aug 3, 2022, at 8:09 AM, Schanzenbach, Martin
wrote:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal-00
> does not seem to be a predecessor of
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/
You are correct; this was my mistake. draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal
> On 3. Aug 2022, at 16:46, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
> On Aug 3, 2022, at 12:36 AM, Schanzenbach, Martin
> wrote:
>>
>> Having now read further I am pretty convinced that the advisory is not
>> useful in the context of this thread discussion.
>> Ist sais at the end that [1] was the "impetus" f
On Aug 3, 2022, at 12:36 AM, Schanzenbach, Martin
wrote:
>
> Having now read further I am pretty convinced that the advisory is not useful
> in the context of this thread discussion.
> Ist sais at the end that [1] was the "impetus" for the advisory.
Reading a five-year old version of a draft i
Having now read further I am pretty convinced that the advisory is not useful
in the context of this thread discussion.
Ist sais at the end that [1] was the "impetus" for the advisory.
However, [1] states that
"Why not use .alt?
The proposed .alt presudo-TLD is specifically only for use as a
I just read it and on page 5 it specifically excludes .onion and .gnu as
those do not use the DNS protocol (citing also the alt draft here).
So this is equivalent to the .alt draft only if the private-use TLD is
not limited to private-use DNS queries as investigated in the document.
I find this to
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 07:11:38PM +, Paul Hoffman wrote:
recommends that the ICANN board to pick a string that will never be put
into the DNS root, and thus is usable for systems like GNS.
This was, of course, the whole point of the .alt draft in the first place, at
least when I was inv
Disclaimer: I work for the Internet Society but I am not speaking for them.
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 07:11:38PM +, Paul Hoffman wrote:
recommends that the ICANN board to pick a string that will never be put into
the DNS root, and thus is usable for systems like GNS.
This was, of course, t
The ISE started this thread with a discussion that included "Whether that means
using TLD labels that begin with _ or whether that means suffixing them with
".ALT", I leave to you experts to sort." There is another forthcoming option
that could be used in draft-schanzen-gns, namely the unallocat