Re: [DNSOP] [TCP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-00.txt

2015-03-10 Thread John Dickinson
On 9 Mar 2015, at 16:32, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > I re-send here two questions that have apparently not been addressed > in -01 Hi Stephane, Sorry, this was my oversight. I have added them to the issue tracker at https://github.com/DNSOP/draft-5966-bis. I will make sure they are addresse

Re: [DNSOP] [TCP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-00.txt

2015-03-09 Thread Ray Bellis
> On 9 Mar 2015, at 16:32, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > I re-send here two questions that have apparently not been addressed > in -01 > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 06:42:26PM +0100, > Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote > a message of 37 lines which said: > >> Section 3, "some network devices delibera

Re: [DNSOP] [TCP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-00.txt

2015-03-09 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
I re-send here two questions that have apparently not been addressed in -01 On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 06:42:26PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote a message of 37 lines which said: > Section 3, "some network devices deliberately refuse to handle DNS > packets containing EDNS0 options" Isn't it t

[DNSOP] [TCP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-00.txt

2015-01-04 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 05:58:01AM -0800, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote a message of 37 lines which said: > Title : DNS Transport over TCP - Implementation Requirements One month later... Sorry. I have read draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-00 and I like it. I think the general ide