Re: [DNSOP] [internet-dra...@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt]

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:32:31PM -0300, Shane Kerr wrote a message of 47 lines which said: > One minor possible concern is with .ONION, where I assume that the Tor > operators would prefer as little leakage as possible. It seems that a > DNAME to EMPTY.AS112.ARPA which goes to an unmanaged a

Re: [DNSOP] [internet-dra...@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt]

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:32:31PM -0300, Shane Kerr wrote a message of 47 lines which said: > Hm, interesting. Be careful with your approval, because I'll ask Yeti to test it :-) > One minor possible concern is with .ONION, where I assume that the > Tor operators would prefer as little leak

Re: [DNSOP] [internet-dra...@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt]

Stephane, At 2016-04-06 13:37:15 -0300 Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > This draft is a result of a proposal I made in Yokohama > > where it seems it received some interest. > > I do not ask to discuss it during our DNSOP meetings (

[DNSOP] [internet-dra...@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt]

This draft is a result of a proposal I made in Yokohama where it seems it received some interest. I do not ask to discuss it during our DNSOP meetings (I sent it too late for that and there are still too many TODOs). But it is part